170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36350600)
1. The impact of simulation time in predicting binding free energies using end-point approaches.
Sokouti B; Dastmalchi S; Hamzeh-Mivehroud M
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2022 Oct; 20(5):2250024. PubMed ID: 36350600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.
Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of an automated procedure for the prediction of relative free energies of binding on a set of aldose reductase inhibitors.
Ferrari AM; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M; Rastelli G
Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 15(24):7865-77. PubMed ID: 17870536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for RNA-ligand complexes.
Jiang D; Du H; Zhao H; Deng Y; Wu Z; Wang J; Zeng Y; Zhang H; Wang X; Wang E; Hou T; Hsieh CY
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Mar; 26(13):10323-10335. PubMed ID: 38501198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of radii sets, entropy, QM methods, and sampling on MM-PBSA, MM-GBSA, and QM/MM-GBSA ligand binding energies of F. tularensis enoyl-ACP reductase (FabI).
Su PC; Tsai CC; Mehboob S; Hevener KE; Johnson ME
J Comput Chem; 2015 Sep; 36(25):1859-73. PubMed ID: 26216222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Well Does the Extended Linear Interaction Energy Method Perform in Accurate Binding Free Energy Calculations?
Hao D; He X; Ji B; Zhang S; Wang J
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):6624-6633. PubMed ID: 33213150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing protein-ligand binding modes with computational tools: the case of PDE4B.
Çifci G; Aviyente V; Akten ED; Monard G
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jun; 31(6):563-575. PubMed ID: 28534194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uni-GBSA: an open-source and web-based automatic workflow to perform MM/GB(PB)SA calculations for virtual screening.
Yang M; Bo Z; Xu T; Xu B; Wang D; Zheng H
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jul; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 37328705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations.
Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jan; 51(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 21117705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.
He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discovery of a novel SHP2 allosteric inhibitor using virtual screening, FMO calculation, and molecular dynamic simulation.
Yuan Z; Zhang M; Chang L; Chen X; Ruan S; Shi S; Zhang Y; Zhu L; Li H; Li S
J Mol Model; 2024 Apr; 30(5):131. PubMed ID: 38613643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA.
Rastelli G; Del Rio A; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M
J Comput Chem; 2010 Mar; 31(4):797-810. PubMed ID: 19569205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the Performance of MM/PBSA, MM/GBSA, and QM-MM/GBSA Approaches on Protein/Carbohydrate Complexes: Effect of Implicit Solvent Models, QM Methods, and Entropic Contributions.
Mishra SK; Koča J
J Phys Chem B; 2018 Aug; 122(34):8113-8121. PubMed ID: 30084252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding Aldose Reductase-Inhibitors interactions with free energy simulation.
Sun Z; Wang X; Zhao Q; Zhu T
J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Sep; 91():10-21. PubMed ID: 31128525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking.
Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Aug; 18(32):22129-39. PubMed ID: 27444142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molecular dynamics investigation on a series of HIV protease inhibitors: assessing the performance of MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA approaches.
Srivastava HK; Sastry GN
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):3088-98. PubMed ID: 23121465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical Analysis on the Performance of Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area versus Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations: Bromodomains as a Case Study.
Aldeghi M; Bodkin MJ; Knapp S; Biggin PC
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Sep; 57(9):2203-2221. PubMed ID: 28786670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficient Approximation of Ligand Rotational and Translational Entropy Changes upon Binding for Use in MM-PBSA Calculations.
Ben-Shalom IY; Pfeiffer-Marek S; Baringhaus KH; Gohlke H
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Feb; 57(2):170-189. PubMed ID: 27996253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 7. Entropy effects on the performance of end-point binding free energy calculation approaches.
Sun H; Duan L; Chen F; Liu H; Wang Z; Pan P; Zhu F; Zhang JZH; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 May; 20(21):14450-14460. PubMed ID: 29785435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
