These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36351214)

  • 1. Independent Homebirth Midwives in France: The Persecution of a Profession.
    Sestito R
    Med Anthropol; 2023 Feb; 42(2):149-162. PubMed ID: 36351214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Under scrutiny: Midwives' experience of intrapartum transfer from home to hospital within the context of a planned homebirth in Western Australia.
    Ball C; Hauck Y; Kuliukas L; Lewis L; Doherty D
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2016 Jun; 8():88-93. PubMed ID: 27179383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From hospital to home: Australian midwives' experiences of transitioning into publicly-funded homebirth programs.
    Coddington R; Catling C; Homer CS
    Women Birth; 2017 Feb; 30(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 27594344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
    Kataoka Y; Eto H; Iida M
    Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States.
    Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Brent RL; Arabin B; Levene MI; Chervenak FA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):350.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25446661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006-2009.
    Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Sapra KJ; Brent RL; Levene MI; Arabin B; Chervenak FA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 211(4):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24662716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting.
    Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Sapra KJ; Brent RL; Levene MI; Arabin B; Chervenak FA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 209(4):323.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23791692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medicalization and obstetric care: an analysis of developments in Dutch midwifery.
    Smeenk AD; ten Have HA
    Med Health Care Philos; 2003; 6(2):153-65. PubMed ID: 12870636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.
    Janssen PA; Saxell L; Page LA; Klein MC; Liston RM; Lee SK
    CMAJ; 2009 Sep; 181(6-7):377-83. PubMed ID: 19720688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrapartum Care Working Patterns of Midwives: The Long Road to Models of Care in Germany.
    Gross MM; Michelsen C; Vaske B; Helbig S
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2018 Apr; 222(2):72-81. PubMed ID: 29341048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the type of birth attendant.
    Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Orosz B; Chervenak FA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):254.e1-254.e8. PubMed ID: 32044310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Labor and birth care by nurse with midwifery skills in Brazil.
    Gama SG; Viellas EF; Torres JA; Bastos MH; Brüggemann OM; Theme Filha MM; Schilithz AO; Leal MD
    Reprod Health; 2016 Oct; 13(Suppl 3):123. PubMed ID: 27766971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Midwife-attended births in the United States, 1990-2012: results from revised birth certificate data.
    Declercq E
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 25712276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Burning bridges: policy, practice, and the destruction of midwifery in rural Costa Rica.
    Jenkins GL
    Soc Sci Med; 2003 May; 56(9):1893-909. PubMed ID: 12650728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009.
    Cheyney M; Bovbjerg M; Everson C; Gordon W; Hannibal D; Vedam S
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 24479690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reinscribing the birthing body: homebirth as ritual performance.
    Cheyney M
    Med Anthropol Q; 2011 Dec; 25(4):519-42. PubMed ID: 22338293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seeing birth in a new light: The transformational effect of exposure to homebirth for hospital-based midwives.
    Coddington R; Catling C; Homer C
    Midwifery; 2020 Sep; 88():102755. PubMed ID: 32497819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Midwives' care on a labour ward prior to the introduction of a midwifery model of care: a field of tension.
    Nilsson C; Olafsdottir OA; Lundgren I; Berg M; Dellenborg L
    Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being; 2019 Dec; 14(1):1593037. PubMed ID: 30924414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why do women choose homebirth in Australia? A national survey.
    Sassine H; Burns E; Ormsby S; Dahlen HG
    Women Birth; 2021 Jul; 34(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 32636161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and validation of a national data registry for midwife-led births: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project 2.0 dataset.
    Cheyney M; Bovbjerg M; Everson C; Gordon W; Hannibal D; Vedam S
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 24479670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.