167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36351746)
21. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review.
Fusegi A; Kanao H; Tsumura S; Murakami A; Abe A; Aoki Y; Nomura H
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 34(1):e5. PubMed ID: 36424702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for stage IA cervical carcinoma: a survival analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Nasioudis D; Byrne M; Ko EM; Haggerty AF; Cory L; Giuntoli Ii RL; Kim SH; Latif NA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Aug; 31(8):1099-1103. PubMed ID: 33962993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adjuvant hysterectomy following primary chemoradiation for stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer: a retrospective comparison of complications for open versus minimally invasive surgery.
Miller H; Matsuo K; Roman LD; Yessaian AA; Pham HQ; Hom M; Castaneda A; Pham A; Ragab O; Muderspach L; Ciccone M; Brunette LL
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 34187504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pattern of relapse in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy as primary treatment. Minimally invasive surgery vs. open approach. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Manzour N; Núñez-Cordoba JM; Chiva L; Chacón E; Boria F; Vara-García J; Rodriguez-Velandia YP; Minguez JA; Alcazar JL
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 164(2):455-460. PubMed ID: 34848071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li Y; Kong Q; Wei H; Wang Y
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253143. PubMed ID: 34197466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy.
Chacon E; Manzour N; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Núñez-Córdoba JM; Martin-Calvo N; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Shamistan A; Gil Moreno A; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Boria F; Alcazar JL; Chiva L; ;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Feb; 32(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 35039455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.
Uppal S; Gehrig PA; Peng K; Bixel KL; Matsuo K; Vetter MH; Davidson BA; Cisa MP; Lees BF; Brunette LL; Tucker K; Stuart Staley A; Gotlieb WH; Holloway RW; Essel KG; Holman LL; Goldfeld E; Olawaiye A; Rose SL
J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 38(10):1030-1040. PubMed ID: 32031867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fertility-sparing surgery after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in women with cervical cancer larger than 4 cm: a systematic review.
Viveros-Carreño D; Rodriguez J; Rendon Pereira GJ; Slama J; Halaska MJ; Robova H; Pareja R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Apr; 32(4):486-493. PubMed ID: 35210296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: A two-center retrospective cohort study with pathologic review of usual-type adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma.
Kim Y; Kim SI; Kim H; Lee M; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Lee C; Suh DH
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 167(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 35970602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan.
Ohta T; Nagase S; Okui Y; Enomoto T; Yamagami W; Mikami M; Tokunaga H; Ino K; Ushijima K; Shozu M; Tashiro H; Mandai M; Miyamoto S; Morishige KI; Yoshida Y; Yoshino K; Saito T; Kobayashi E; Kobayashi H; Takekuma M; Terai Y; Fujii T; Kanao H; Aoki D; Katabuchi H; Yaegashi N
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Dec; 26(12):2318-2330. PubMed ID: 34435284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer.
Falcetta FS; Medeiros LR; Edelweiss MI; Pohlmann PR; Stein AT; Rosa DD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 11(11):CD005342. PubMed ID: 27873308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radical Hysterectomy With Preoperative Conization in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis.
Zhu X; Ye L; Fu Y; You B; Lu W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 31(3):193-199. PubMed ID: 38016630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs. Open Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Wang Y; Li B; Ren F; Song Z; Ouyang L; Liu K
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1236. PubMed ID: 32903313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
