These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36351823)

  • 1. Neuroscience Needs to Test Both Statistical and Scientific Hypotheses.
    Alger BE
    J Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 42(45):8432-8438. PubMed ID: 36351823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian inference of population prevalence.
    Ince RA; Paton AT; Kay JW; Schyns PG
    Elife; 2021 Oct; 10():. PubMed ID: 34612811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation versus falsification approaches in sport and exercise science.
    Wilkinson M; Winter EM
    J Sports Sci; 2019 Jan; 37(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 29786469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific Hypothesis-Testing Strengthens Neuroscience Research.
    Alger BE
    eNeuro; 2020; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 32641499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.
    García-Pérez MA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Aug; 77(4):631-662. PubMed ID: 30034024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Better Inference in Neuroscience: Test Less, Estimate More.
    Calin-Jageman RJ
    J Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 42(45):8427-8431. PubMed ID: 36351833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current controversies: Null hypothesis significance testing.
    Sedgwick PM; Hammer A; Kesmodel US; Pedersen LH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jun; 101(6):624-627. PubMed ID: 35451497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond p-values in the evaluation of brain-computer interfaces: A Bayesian estimation approach.
    Melinscak F; Montesano L
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Sep; 270():30-45. PubMed ID: 27317498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moving college health research forward: Reconsidering our reliance on statistical significance testing.
    Barry AE; Valdez D; Goodson P; Szucs L; Reyes JV
    J Am Coll Health; 2019 Apr; 67(3):181-188. PubMed ID: 29952723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian analysis for nurse and midwifery research: statistical, practical and ethical benefits.
    Malone HE; Coyne I
    Nurse Res; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36655468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why we habitually engage in null-hypothesis significance testing: A qualitative study.
    Stunt J; van Grootel L; Bouter L; Trafimow D; Hoekstra T; de Boer M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258330. PubMed ID: 34653185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
    Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence intervals permit, but do not guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testing.
    Coulson M; Healey M; Fidler F; Cumming G
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():26. PubMed ID: 21607077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The new statistics: why and how.
    Cumming G
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):7-29. PubMed ID: 24220629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: a quiet methodological revolution.
    Rodgers JL
    Am Psychol; 2010 Jan; 65(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20063905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment.
    Szucs D; Ioannidis JPA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():390. PubMed ID: 28824397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975-2014: a systematic review.
    Stang A; Deckert M; Poole C; Rothman KJ
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 27858205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical reporting inconsistencies in experimental philosophy.
    Colombo M; Duev G; Nuijten MB; Sprenger J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194360. PubMed ID: 29649220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BETTER STATISTICS FOR BETTER DECISIONS: REJECTING NULL HYPOTHESES STATISTICAL TESTS IN FAVOR OF REPLICATION STATISTICS.
    Sanabria F; Killeen PR
    Psychol Sch; 2007 May; 44(5):471-481. PubMed ID: 19122766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.