177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36351962)
1. Moving beyond response times with accessible measures of manual dynamics.
Smith KA; Morrison S; Henderson AME; Erb CD
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19065. PubMed ID: 36351962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tracking continuities in the flanker task: From continuous flow to movement trajectories.
Erb CD; Smith KA; Moher J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):731-747. PubMed ID: 33089369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Layers of latent effects in cognitive control: An EEG investigation.
Erb CD; Cavanagh JF
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Apr; 195():1-11. PubMed ID: 30831386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reach tracking reveals dissociable processes underlying inhibitory control in 5- to 10-year-olds and adults.
Erb CD; Moher J; Song JH; Sobel DM
Dev Sci; 2018 Mar; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 28233397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Insights into the control of arm movement during body motion as revealed by EMG analyses.
Blouin J; Guillaud E; Bresciani JP; Guerraz M; Simoneau M
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1309():40-52. PubMed ID: 19883633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of directional compatibility on the response latencies of ocular and manual movements.
Niechwiej-Szwedo E; McIlroy WE; Green R; Verrier MC
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 15599726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linking the dynamics of cognitive control to individual differences in working memory capacity: Evidence from reaching behavior.
Erb CD; Welhaf MS; Smeekens BA; Moreau D; Kane MJ; Marcovitch S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1383-1402. PubMed ID: 34197169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography.
Salisbury DF; Rutherford B; Shenton ME; McCarley RW
Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1676-84. PubMed ID: 11514251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamics of attentional focusing in the Eriksen flanker task.
Servant M; Logan GD
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2710-2721. PubMed ID: 31250363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tradeoff between manual response speed and pursuit accuracy revealed by a deadline procedure.
Seya Y; Mori S
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1845-54. PubMed ID: 25804863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fifteen-month-old infants use velocity information to predict others' action targets.
Stapel JC; Hunnius S; Bekkering H
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1092. PubMed ID: 26300801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporal predictive mechanisms modulate motor reaction time during initiation and inhibition of speech and hand movement.
Johari K; Behroozmand R
Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Aug; 54():41-50. PubMed ID: 28371663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A flanker effect for moving visual stimuli.
Lange-Malecki B; Treue S
Vision Res; 2012 Jun; 62():134-8. PubMed ID: 22811985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motor response programming and movement time in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure.
Simmons RW; Thomas JD; Levy SS; Riley EP
Alcohol; 2010 Jun; 44(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 20598488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Approach and avoidance movements are unaffected by cognitive conflict: a comparison of the Simon effect and stimulus-response compatibility.
Kerzel D; Buetti S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 22454332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Twisting tongues to test for conflict-monitoring in speech production.
Acheson DJ; Hagoort P
Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():206. PubMed ID: 24795592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeated computerized cognitive testing: Performance shifts and test-retest reliability in healthy older adults.
White N; Flannery L; McClintock A; Machado L
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Mar; 41(2):179-191. PubMed ID: 30320531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reaction time latencies of eye and hand movements in single- and dual-task conditions.
Bekkering H; Adam JJ; Kingma H; Huson A; Whiting HT
Exp Brain Res; 1994; 97(3):471-6. PubMed ID: 8187858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of concurrent hand movement on estimated time to contact in a prediction motion task.
Zheng R; Maraj BKV
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 236(7):1953-1962. PubMed ID: 29704034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Space and Motion Stimulus-Response Correspondence (SRC) Effects in a Single Task.
Styrkowiec P
Exp Psychol; 2016 Sep; 63(5):297-306. PubMed ID: 27832733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
