These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36352010)

  • 1. A comparative framework to analyze convergence on Twitter electoral conversations.
    Cárdenas-Sánchez D; Sampayo AM; Rodríguez-Prieto M; Feged-Rivadeneira A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19062. PubMed ID: 36352010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ideological Consumerism in Colombian Elections, 2015: Links Between Political Ideology, Twitter Activity, and Electoral Results.
    Correa JC; Camargo JE
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2017 Jan; 20(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 28080152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconstruction of the socio-semantic dynamics of political activist Twitter networks-Method and application to the 2017 French presidential election.
    Gaumont N; Panahi M; Chavalarias D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0201879. PubMed ID: 30231018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The footprint of campaign strategies in Farsi Twitter: A case for 2021 Iranian presidential election.
    Mohammadi S; Moradi P; Firouzabadi SM; Jafari G
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270822. PubMed ID: 35900976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 280 characters to the White House: predicting 2020 U.S. presidential elections from twitter data.
    Rizk R; Rizk D; Rizk F; Hsu S
    Comput Math Organ Theory; 2023 Mar; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 37360912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forensic analysis of Venezuelan elections during the Chávez presidency.
    Jiménez R; Hidalgo M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100884. PubMed ID: 24971462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What Tweets and YouTube comments have in common? Sentiment and graph analysis on data related to US elections 2020.
    Shevtsov A; Oikonomidou M; Antonakaki D; Pratikakis P; Ioannidis S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0270542. PubMed ID: 36719868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social media's contribution to political misperceptions in U.S. Presidential elections.
    Garrett RK
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213500. PubMed ID: 30917154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media.
    Calvo E; Ventura T; Aruguete N; Waisbord S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0281475. PubMed ID: 36857337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing and modeling an electoral campaign in the context of Twitter: 2011 Spanish Presidential election as a case study.
    Borondo J; Morales AJ; Losada JC; Benito RM
    Chaos; 2012 Jun; 22(2):023138. PubMed ID: 22757545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections.
    Flamino J; Galeazzi A; Feldman S; Macy MW; Cross B; Zhou Z; Serafino M; Bovet A; Makse HA; Szymanski BK
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Jun; 7(6):904-916. PubMed ID: 36914806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.
    Klimek P; Aykaç A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293239. PubMed ID: 37967045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The (un)making of electoral transparency through technology: The 2017 Kenyan presidential election controversy.
    Passanti C; Pommerolle ME
    Soc Stud Sci; 2022 Dec; 52(6):928-953. PubMed ID: 36154350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Studying topic engagement and synergy among candidates for 2020 US Elections.
    Baxi MK; Sharma R; Mago V
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):136. PubMed ID: 36118938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. More tweets, more votes: social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior.
    Digrazia J; McKelvey K; Bollen J; Rojas F
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79449. PubMed ID: 24312181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nursing Organizations' Health Policy Content on Facebook and Twitter Preceding the 2016 United States Presidential Election.
    Waddell A
    J Adv Nurs; 2019 Jan; 75(1):119-128. PubMed ID: 30109719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success
    Gerstlé J; Nai A
    Eur J Commun; 2019 Aug; 34(4):410-444. PubMed ID: 31534293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.