These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36352816)

  • 1. A head-to-head comparison of laser vs. powered mechanical sheaths as first choice and second line extraction tools.
    Zsigmond EJ; Saghy L; Benak A; Miklos M; Makai A; Hegedus Z; Alacs E; Agocs S; Vamos M
    Europace; 2023 Feb; 25(2):591-599. PubMed ID: 36352816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes and costs associated with two different lead-extraction approaches: a single-centre study.
    Gaubert M; Giorgi R; Franceschi F; Koutbi-Franceschi L; Gitenay E; Maille B; Deharo JC
    Europace; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1710-1716. PubMed ID: 27733470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of transvenous lead extraction of very old leads using bidirectional rotational mechanical sheaths: Results of a multicentre study.
    Migliore F; Pittorru R; Dall'Aglio PB; De Lazzari M; Rovaris G; Piazzi E; Dentico A; Ferrieri A; D'Angelo G; Marzi A; Sawaf BE; Bertaglia E; Iliceto S; Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Carretta D; Mazzone P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Mar; 34(3):728-737. PubMed ID: 36477909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between TightRail rotating dilator sheath and GlideLight laser sheath for transvenous lead extraction.
    Qin D; Chokshi M; Sabeh MK; Maan A; Bapat A; Bode WD; Hanley A; Hucker WJ; Ng CY; Funamoto M; Barrett CD; Mela T
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 May; 44(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 33675073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of acute and long-term outcomes of Evolution
    Bahadır N; Canpolat U; Kaya EB; Sahiner ML; Ateş AH; Yorgun H; Aytemir K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 May; 32(5):1395-1404. PubMed ID: 33724617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction in octogenarians using powered extraction sheaths.
    Burger H; Hakmi S; Petersen J; Yildirim Y; Choi YH; Willems S; Reichenspurner H; Ziegelhoeffer T; Pecha S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Apr; 44(4):601-606. PubMed ID: 33594705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of transvenous lead extraction in octogenarians using bidirectional rotational mechanical sheaths.
    Migliore F; Pittorru R; Dall'Aglio PB; De Lazzari M; Falzone PV; Sottini S; Dentico A; Ferrieri A; Pradegan N; Bertaglia E; Iliceto S; Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Carretta D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Aug; 46(8):960-968. PubMed ID: 36951180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safe and effective transvenous lead extraction for elderly patients utilizing non-laser and laser tools: a single-center experience in Japan.
    Okada A; Tabata H; Shoda M; Shoin W; Kobayashi H; Okano T; Yoshie K; Kato K; Saigusa T; Ebisawa S; Motoki H; Kuwahara K
    Heart Vessels; 2021 Jun; 36(6):882-889. PubMed ID: 33394103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transvenous extraction of pacing and defibrillator leads--a single-centre experience.
    Geselle PJ; Poesen R; Rega F; Koopman P; Nuyens D; Heidbuchel H; Willems R
    Acta Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 67(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 23393934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical predictors of adverse patient outcomes in an experience of more than 5000 chronic endovascular pacemaker and defibrillator lead extractions.
    Brunner MP; Cronin EM; Duarte VE; Yu C; Tarakji KG; Martin DO; Callahan T; Cantillon DJ; Niebauer MJ; Saliba WI; Kanj M; Wazni O; Baranowski B; Wilkoff BL
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 May; 11(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 24444444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and mortality of rotating sheaths versus laser sheaths for transvenous lead extraction: a meta-analysis.
    Lee SY; Allen IE; Diaz C; Guo X; Pellegrini C; Beygui R; Cardona-Guarache R; Marcus GM; Lee BK
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2023 Aug; 66(5):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 34839431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advanced techniques for chronic lead extraction: heading from the laser towards the evolution system.
    Mazzone P; Tsiachris D; Marzi A; Ciconte G; Paglino G; Sora N; Gulletta S; Vergara P; Della Bella P
    Europace; 2013 Dec; 15(12):1771-6. PubMed ID: 23645529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety and success of transvenous lead extraction using excimer laser sheaths: a meta-analysis of over 1700 patients.
    Rinaldi CA; Diemberger I; Biffi M; Gao YR; Sizto E; Jin N; Epstein LM; Defaye P
    Europace; 2023 Nov; 25(11):. PubMed ID: 37757839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction in a Referral Center in Northern Israel.
    Haddad R; Birati E; Zayyad H; Andria N; Nachum E; Kachel E; Marai I
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2024 May; 26(5):273-277. PubMed ID: 38736340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of transvenous lead extraction using the TightRail™ mechanical rotating dilator sheath and excimer laser sheath.
    Misra S; Swayampakala K; Coons P; Cerbie C; Guifarro A; Lesiczka M; Holshouser JW; Madjarov J; Love C; Mehta R
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Jul; 32(7):1969-1978. PubMed ID: 34028112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transvenous lead extraction outcomes using a novel hand-powered bidirectional rotational sheath as a first-line extraction tool in a low-volume centre.
    Ksela J; Prevolnik J; Racman M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2021 Apr; 32(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 33249479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of the Patient-Related Outcomes of Mechanical lead Extraction Techniques (PROMET) study: a multicentre retrospective study on advanced mechanical lead extraction techniques.
    Starck CT; Gonzalez E; Al-Razzo O; Mazzone P; Delnoy PP; Breitenstein A; Steffel J; Eulert-Grehn J; Lanmüller P; Melillo F; Marzi A; Sohal M; Domenichini G; Gallagher MM
    Europace; 2020 Jul; 22(7):1103-1110. PubMed ID: 32447388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of non-laser and laser transvenous lead extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Akhtar Z; Kontogiannis C; Georgiopoulos G; Starck CT; Leung LWM; Lee SY; Lee BK; Seshasai SRK; Sohal M; Gallagher MM
    Europace; 2023 Nov; 25(11):. PubMed ID: 37882609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extraction of old pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator leads by laser sheath versus femoral approach.
    Bordachar P; Defaye P; Peyrouse E; Boveda S; Mokrani B; Marquié C; Barandon L; Fossaert EM; Garrigue S; Reuter S; Laborderie J; Marijon E; Deharo JC; Jacon P; Kacet S; Ploux S; Deplagne A; Haissaguerre M; Clementy J; Ritter P; Klug D
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2010 Aug; 3(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 20562442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcomes of non-powered mechanical sheaths for transvenous lead extraction.
    Kutarski A; Czajkowski M; Pietura R; Obszanski B; Polewczyk A; Jachec W; Polewczyk M; Mlynarczyk K; Grabowski M; Opolski G
    Europace; 2018 Aug; 20(8):1324-1333. PubMed ID: 29016781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.