These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36353858)

  • 1. Implications of United States Supreme Court's ruling on Dobbs vs Jackson Women's Health Organization: perspective of physicians caring for critically ill fetuses and newborns.
    Arya B; Donofrio MT; Freud LR; Hornberger LK; Moon-Grady AJ; Morris SA; Pinto N; Simpson LL; Cuneo BF; Divanovic A; Jaeggi E; Peyvandi S; Puchalski MD; Rychik J; Schidlow DN; Srivastava S; Tacy TA; Tworetzky W; Walsh MJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Dec; 60(6):812-813. PubMed ID: 36353858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential Effects of
    Hall TS
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):359-373. PubMed ID: 38344784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of
    Herr A
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 49(4):471-492. PubMed ID: 38563269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO; Goodwin MB
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1695-1696. PubMed ID: 36318123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protecting our Patients and Trainees: The Complex Consequences of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Ruling.
    Ponce SB; Bajaj A; Baniel C; Seldon C; Sim A; Franco I; Pinnix C; Fields E; Jimenez RB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2022 Nov; 114(3):393-395. PubMed ID: 35963469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Associations between state policies, race, ethnicity and rurality, and maternal mortality and morbidity following the United States Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling.
    Williams AM; Chaturvedi R; Pollalis I; Ibarra-Cobarru J; Aaronson JA; White RS
    Br J Anaesth; 2022 Dec; 129(6):e145-e147. PubMed ID: 36163076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion.
    Macklin R
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(4):261-263. PubMed ID: 36398395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Buchbinder M; Mishtal J; Singer EO; Wendland CL
    Med Anthropol Q; 2022 Dec; 36(4):433-441. PubMed ID: 36433774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tubal Sterilization Requests at a Single Institution Following the Supreme Court Decision to Overturn the Constitutional Right to Abortion.
    Liang AC; Gliwa C; Loder CM; Dalton VK; Smith RD
    JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(4):374-375. PubMed ID: 37490094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advancing Birth Equity in a Post-Dobbs US.
    Crear-Perry J; Hassan A; Daniel S
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1689-1690. PubMed ID: 36318120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coming full circle: a reflection on the Supreme Court's decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
    Toti S
    Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):439-440. PubMed ID: 27639929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Court is ignoring science.
    Foster DG
    Science; 2022 May; 376(6595):779. PubMed ID: 35575724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beneath the Sword of Damocles: Moral Obligations of Physicians in a Post-Dobbs Landscape.
    Lyerly AD; Faden RR; Mello MM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2024 May; 54(3):15-27. PubMed ID: 38842894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Money, sex, and religion--the Supreme Court's ACA sequel.
    Annas GJ; Ruger TW; Ruger JP
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Aug; 371(9):862-6. PubMed ID: 25029337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical and Advocacy Implications of the
    Gautham I; Coverdale J; Nguyen PT; Gordon MR
    Violence Against Women; 2024 Mar; ():10778012241231779. PubMed ID: 38425289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Policy Changes as a Context for Moral Injury Development in the Wake of Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization.
    Desai A; Holliday R; Wallis M; Thornewill A; Bahraini NH; Borges LM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 141(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 36701606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mother's rights can't be infringed to protect fetus, Supreme Court's landmark ruling states.
    Capen K
    CMAJ; 1997 Dec; 157(11):1586-7. PubMed ID: 9400417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protecting marginalized women's mental health in the post-Dobbs era.
    Nguyen D; Bajaj SS; Ahmed D; Stanford FC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Oct; 119(40):e2212012119. PubMed ID: 36149969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Has the Supreme Court become just another political branch? Public perceptions of court approval and legitimacy in a post-
    Levendusky M; Patterson S; Margolis M; Pasek J; Winneg K; Jamieson KH
    Sci Adv; 2024 Mar; 10(10):eadk9590. PubMed ID: 38457495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.