157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36354108)
1. Readability, reliability and credibility of online patient information on skin grafts.
Heaven CL; Patel C; Ahmadi O; Mathy JA
Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Feb; 64(1):e57-e64. PubMed ID: 36354108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information.
Raja H; Patel K
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 Sep; 105(7):639-644. PubMed ID: 36374281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.
Mac OA; Thayre A; Tan S; Dodd RH
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e16701. PubMed ID: 32442134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis.
Yurdakul OV; Kilicoglu MS; Bagcier F
Arch Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Nov; 65(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 33166440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.
Ahmadi O; Louw J; Leinonen H; Gan PYC
Br J Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 35(5):551-554. PubMed ID: 33769170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Readability and quality of online information for patients pertaining to revision knee arthroplasty: An objective analysis.
Murphy B; Irwin S; Condon F; Kennedy C
Surgeon; 2022 Dec; 20(6):e366-e370. PubMed ID: 35034835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.
Aboalshamat K
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):797. PubMed ID: 37880640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dr Google - assessing the reliability and readability of information on general surgical procedures found via search engines.
Ramli R; Jambor MA; Kong CY
ANZ J Surg; 2023 Mar; 93(3):590-596. PubMed ID: 36716246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Information for Patients and Their Families Regarding Schizophrenia.
Ekinci O; Koyuncu AN
J Nerv Ment Dis; 2024 May; 212(5):278-283. PubMed ID: 38416420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of readability and reliability of online patient information for intracranial aneurysms.
Patel CB; Kerr N; Ahmadi O; Muthu T
ANZ J Surg; 2022 Apr; 92(4):843-847. PubMed ID: 34967087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading?
Murtaza F; Shirreff L; Huang LN; Jacobson M; Jarcevic R; Christakis MK
Menopause; 2021 Dec; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34905747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clear as Mud: Readability Scores in Cloacal Exstrophy Literature and Its Treatment.
Haffar A; Hirsch A; Morrill C; Garcia A; Werner Z; Gearhart JP; Crigger C
Res Rep Urol; 2024; 16():39-44. PubMed ID: 38370509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Hassan AK; Eleiwa TK; Hassan MA; Sallam AB; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Gise R; Phillips PH; Elhusseiny AM
J Neuroophthalmol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38527126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality and readability of online information on plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur.
Kaya E; Görmez S
Rheumatol Int; 2022 Nov; 42(11):1965-1972. PubMed ID: 35763090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Online Patient Education Material About Dysphagia.
Steiner SM; Slavych BK; Zraick RI
Dysphagia; 2023 Jun; 38(3):990-1000. PubMed ID: 36205800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
