157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36354108)
21. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of the Arabic patient-centered online information about orthodontic pain: A quality and readability assessment.
Alassaf MS; Hamadallah HH; Almuzaini A; Aloufi AM; Al-Turki KN; Khoshhal AS; Alsulaimani MA; Eshky R
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303308. PubMed ID: 38781283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessing the readability and quality of online information on anosmia.
Raja H; Lodhi S
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Feb; 106(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 37051757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluating the Quality and Readability of Online Resources on Unspecified Kidney Donation.
Stavropoulou-Tatla S; Awal DH; Fardanesh A; McCaig F; Hossain MA
Transplant Proc; 2022 Apr; 54(3):582-586. PubMed ID: 35307169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on post-covid pain.
Ozduran E; Büyükçoban S
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13686. PubMed ID: 35880220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.
Vågenes H; Pranić SM
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 May; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 37189154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluating the Readability, Quality and Reliability of Online Patient Education Materials on Spinal Cord Stimulation.
Gunduz ME; Matis GK; Ozduran E; Hanci V
Turk Neurosurg; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38874237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quality and readability of online information on hand osteoarthritis.
Hong SW; Kang JH; Park JH; Park HJ; Kim E
Health Informatics J; 2023; 29(1):14604582231169297. PubMed ID: 36995242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Quality and accuracy of patient-oriented Web-based information regarding tooth avulsion.
Nangia D; Saini A; Krishnan A; Sharma S; Kumar V; Chawla A; Logani A
Dent Traumatol; 2022 Aug; 38(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 35225429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Transoral robotic surgery: Differences between online information and academic literature.
Shetty KR; Wong K; Hashemi S; Shetty A; Levi JR
Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(4):102395. PubMed ID: 32008838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. All I Have Learned, I Have Learned from Google: Why Today's Facial Rejuvenation Patients are Prone to Misinformation, and the Steps We can take to Contend with Unreliable Information.
Mehta N; Gupta A; Nissan M
Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 35(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31412380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessing the readability and quality of online information on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
Raja H; Almansoor ZR
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Jan; 106(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 36748797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Readability and Quality of Online Information on Sickle Cell Retinopathy for Patients.
Gbedemah ZEE; Fuseini MN; Fordjuor SKEJ; Baisie-Nkrumah EJ; Beecham REM; Amissah-Arthur KN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2024 Mar; 259():45-52. PubMed ID: 37918780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of quality and readability of internet-based health information related to commonly prescribed angiotensin receptor blockers.
Oloidi A; Nduaguba SO; Obamiro K
Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 35():70. PubMed ID: 32537073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.
Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A
Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
