BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36354108)

  • 41. Quality and readability of online patient information on treatment for erectile dysfunction.
    Pattenden TA; Raleigh RA; Pattenden ER; Thangasamy IA
    BJUI Compass; 2021 Nov; 2(6):412-418. PubMed ID: 35474701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.
    Clothier W; Treffalls JA; Tolbert PH; Harbin Z; Yan Q; Davies MG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 85():96-104. PubMed ID: 35461994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
    Özduran E; Hanci V
    Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
    Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
    Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessment of Arabic Web-Based Knowledge About Clear Aligners: An Infodemiologic Study.
    Alsulaimani M; Alassaf MS; Hamadallah HH; Aloufi AM; Alturki KN; Almghamsi AM; Eshky RT
    Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e46879. PubMed ID: 37841990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Readability of online patient education materials for parents after a failed newborn hearing screen.
    Sax L; Razak A; Shetty K; Cohen M; Levi J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():168-174. PubMed ID: 31326734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Accessibility and Readability of Dementia-Related Information on Websites.
    Arief M; Kinnunen UM; Saranto K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 251():229-232. PubMed ID: 29968645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers.
    Choudhery S; Xi Y; Chen H; Aboul-Fettouh N; Goldenmerry Y; Ho C; Viroslav H; Zhang C; Goudreau S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 32428435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment-an assessment of content, quality, and readability.
    Alpaydın MT; Buyuk SK; Canigur Bavbek N
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct; 83(Suppl 1):1-12. PubMed ID: 34269827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How Readable Is BPH Treatment Information on the Internet? Assessing Barriers to Literacy in Prostate Health.
    Koo K; Yap RL
    Am J Mens Health; 2017 Mar; 11(2):300-307. PubMed ID: 27903952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A systematic review of internet-based information on dermatomyositis and polymyositis.
    Haque A; Cox M; Sandler RD; Hughes M
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 32812386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma.
    Martin CA; Khan S; Lee R; Do AT; Sridhar J; Crowell EL; Bowden EC
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(5):525-530. PubMed ID: 35301989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Health websites on COVID-19: are they readable and credible enough to help public self-care?
    Valizadeh-Haghi S; Khazaal Y; Rahmatizadeh S
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2021 Jan; 109(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 33424467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessing the Quality and Readability of Online Resources for Plantar Fasciitis.
    Lim ST; Kelly M; O'Neill S; D'Souza L
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2021; 60(6):1175-1178. PubMed ID: 34092460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment of Quality and Readability of Online Patient-Centered Arabic Web-Based Knowledge About Apicoectomy.
    Bafail A; Mohammad RA; Shahada MO; Alsaedi AM; Masoudi AA; Karbouji ME; Alassaf MS
    Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e48333. PubMed ID: 37942129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Quality and readability of online patient information on the left ventricular assist device.
    Rouhi AD; Han JJ; Ghanem YK; Pervaiz SS; Suarez-Pierre A; Choudhury RA; Bermudez CA; Williams NN; Dumon KR
    Artif Organs; 2023 Jun; 47(6):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 36478254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Assessing comprehension of online information in the United States for third-line treatment of overactive bladder.
    Werner Z; Trump T; Zaslau S; Shapiro R
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Mar; 34(3):701-705. PubMed ID: 35556151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Internet Health Resources on Nocturnal Enuresis: A Readability, Quality, and Accuracy Analysis.
    Fung ACH; Lee MHL; Leung JL; Chan IHY; Wong KKY
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2024 Feb; 34(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 37595631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Knee osteotomy: Quality tools and readability data of information on the internet.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Data Brief; 2021 Feb; 34():106624. PubMed ID: 33354604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.