157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36354108)
61. High tibial osteotomy: A review of the readability and quality of patient information on the internet.
Clark M; Baxter IC; Hampton M; Sandler RD; Legg A
Health Promot Perspect; 2021; 11(3):323-328. PubMed ID: 34660227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Proximal Humerus Fracture: An Evaluation of the Readability and Value of Web-Based Knowledge.
Elshohna M; Hidayat Y; Karkuri A
Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e27957. PubMed ID: 36120225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment.
Cohen SA; Fisher AC; Pershing S
Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():779-788. PubMed ID: 36923248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Quality and readability of internet-based information on halitosis.
Jo JH; Kim EJ; Kim JR; Kim MJ; Chung JW; Park JW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Mar; 125(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 29325852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Evaluating on-line health information for patients with polymyalgia rheumatica: a descriptive study.
Vivekanantham A; Protheroe J; Muller S; Hider S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jan; 18(1):43. PubMed ID: 28122554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet.
Grewal P; Alagaratnam S
Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 23523948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Online Patient Information on Domiciliary Oxygen Therapy: An Evaluation of Quality, Suitability, Reliability, Readability, and Content.
Ang HL; Tan HH; Logie KM; McDonald CF; Khor YH
Chest; 2022 Feb; 161(2):483-491. PubMed ID: 34390709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries.
Worrall AP; Connolly MJ; O'Neill A; O'Doherty M; Thornton KP; McNally C; McConkey SJ; de Barra E
BMC Public Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1635. PubMed ID: 33183297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Quality and readability of online information on dental treatment for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea.
Jo JH; Kim JR; Kim MJ; Chung JW; Park JW
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Jan; 133():104000. PubMed ID: 31731221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Readability and quality of online patient health information on parotidectomy.
Tan JY; Tan YC; Yap D
J Laryngol Otol; 2023 Dec; 137(12):1378-1383. PubMed ID: 37606526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Online educational materials for appendectomy patients have good quality but poor readability.
Rai R; Landsberg A; Nguyen A; Wiseman SM
Am J Surg; 2021 Jun; 221(6):1203-1210. PubMed ID: 33712262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Analyzing the Readability of Online Urogynecologic Patient Information.
Stewart JR; Heit MH; Meriwether KV; Hobson DT; Francis SL
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 29117016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Quality and Reliability of Publicly Accessible Information on Laser Treatments for Urinary Incontinence: What Is Available to Our Patients?
Perruzza D; Jolliffe C; Butti A; McCaffrey C; Kung R; Gagnon L; Lee P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1524-1530. PubMed ID: 31927043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Is Online Patient-Centered Information About Implant Bone Graft Valid?
Alassaf MS; Hammudah HA; Almuzaini ES; Othman AA
Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e46263. PubMed ID: 37908962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Patient-targeted websites on overactive bladder: What are our patients reading?
Clancy AA; Hickling D; Didomizio L; Sanaee M; Shehata F; Zee R; Khalil H
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Feb; 37(2):832-841. PubMed ID: 28762549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: An Analysis of Readability and Quality of Web-Based information.
Hidayat Y; Rajkoomar AG; Qadeer MA; D'Souza LG
Cureus; 2022 Jun; 14(6):e26029. PubMed ID: 35859974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.
Walsh TM; Volsko TA
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 18811992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Ankle conFUSION: The quality and readability of information on the internet relating to ankle arthrodesis.
Irwin SC; Lennon DT; Stanley CP; Sheridan GA; Walsh JC
Surgeon; 2021 Dec; 19(6):e507-e511. PubMed ID: 33451875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability of Internet Websites about Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Saleh D; Fisher JH; Provencher S; Liang Z; Ryerson CJ; Weatherald J
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1404-1413. PubMed ID: 34813417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
