These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36354533)

  • 1. Machine Learning for Aiding Blood Flow Velocity Estimation Based on Angiography.
    Padhee S; Johnson M; Yi H; Banerjee T; Yang Z
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2022 Oct; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 36354533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image2Flow: A proof-of-concept hybrid image and graph convolutional neural network for rapid patient-specific pulmonary artery segmentation and CFD flow field calculation from 3D cardiac MRI data.
    Yao T; Pajaziti E; Quail M; Schievano S; Steeden J; Muthurangu V
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 Jun; 20(6):e1012231. PubMed ID: 38900817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Steady Flow in a Patient-Averaged Inferior Vena Cava-Part II: Computational Fluid Dynamics Verification and Validation.
    Craven BA; Aycock KI; Manning KB
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):654-673. PubMed ID: 30446978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of an Experimental and Digital Cardiovascular Arterial Model for Transient Hemodynamic and Postural Change Studies: "A Preliminary Framework Analysis".
    Hewlin RL; Kizito JP
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Mar; 9(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 29124548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-Laboratory Characterization of the Velocity Field in the FDA Blood Pump Model Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).
    Hariharan P; Aycock KI; Buesen M; Day SW; Good BC; Herbertson LH; Steinseifer U; Manning KB; Craven BA; Malinauskas RA
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):623-640. PubMed ID: 30291585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms.
    Berg P; Roloff C; Beuing O; Voss S; Sugiyama S; Aristokleous N; Anayiotos AS; Ashton N; Revell A; Bressloff NW; Brown AG; Chung BJ; Cebral JR; Copelli G; Fu W; Qiao A; Geers AJ; Hodis S; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nordahl E; Bora Suzen Y; Owais Khan M; Valen-Sendstad K; Kono K; Menon PG; Albal PG; Mierka O; Münster R; Morales HG; Bonnefous O; Osman J; Goubergrits L; Pallares J; Cito S; Passalacqua A; Piskin S; Pekkan K; Ramalho S; Marques N; Sanchi S; Schumacher KR; Sturgeon J; Švihlová H; Hron J; Usera G; Mendina M; Xiang J; Meng H; Steinman DA; Janiga G
    J Biomech Eng; 2015 Dec; 137(12):121008. PubMed ID: 26473395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of the Human Pulmonary Arteries with Experimental Validation.
    Bordones AD; Leroux M; Kheyfets VO; Wu YA; Chen CY; Finol EA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1309-1324. PubMed ID: 29786774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-individualized boundary conditions for CFD simulations using time-resolved 3D angiography.
    Boegel M; Gehrisch S; Redel T; Rohkohl C; Hoelter P; Doerfler A; Maier A; Kowarschik M
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jun; 11(6):1061-9. PubMed ID: 27017497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models.
    Ford MD; Nikolov HN; Milner JS; Lownie SP; Demont EM; Kalata W; Loth F; Holdsworth DW; Steinman DA
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021015. PubMed ID: 18412502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic Study of a Patient-Specific Intracranial Aneurysm: Comparative Assessment of Tomographic PIV, Stereoscopic PIV, In Vivo MRI and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
    Wu X; Gürzing S; Schinkel C; Toussaint M; Perinajová R; van Ooij P; Kenjereš S
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2022 Jun; 13(3):428-442. PubMed ID: 34750782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deep learning-based hemodynamic prediction of carotid artery stenosis before and after surgical treatments.
    Wang S; Wu D; Li G; Zhang Z; Xiao W; Li R; Qiao A; Jin L; Liu H
    Front Physiol; 2022; 13():1094743. PubMed ID: 36703930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Divergence Compensatory Optical Flow Method for Blood Velocimetry.
    Yang Z; Yu H; Huang GP; Ludwig B
    J Biomech Eng; 2017 Jun; 139(6):. PubMed ID: 28418506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical simulations of flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of CFD results and in vivo MRI measurements.
    Rayz VL; Boussel L; Acevedo-Bolton G; Martin AJ; Young WL; Lawton MT; Higashida R; Saloner D
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051011. PubMed ID: 19045518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Initial evaluation of 2D and 3D simulated high-speed 1000 fps vascular contrast-flow image sequences using computational fluid dynamics (CFD).
    Shields A; Williams K; Veeturi SS; Tutino V; Ionita C; Bednarek DR; Rudin S
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2022; 12036():. PubMed ID: 35983493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation on aortic hemodynamics based on physics-informed neural network.
    Du M; Zhang C; Xie S; Pu F; Zhang D; Li D
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 May; 20(7):11545-11567. PubMed ID: 37501408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of ultrasound velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics for flow assessment in femoral artery stenotic disease.
    van de Velde L; van Helvert M; Engelhard S; Ghanbarzadeh-Dagheyan A; Mirgolbabaee H; Voorneveld J; Lajoinie G; Versluis M; Reijnen MMPJ; Groot Jebbink E
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2024 May; 11(3):037001. PubMed ID: 38765874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic segmentation of the great arteries for computational hemodynamic assessment.
    Montalt-Tordera J; Pajaziti E; Jones R; Sauvage E; Puranik R; Singh AAV; Capelli C; Steeden J; Schievano S; Muthurangu V
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2022 Nov; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 36336682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generating wall shear stress for coronary artery in real-time using neural networks: Feasibility and initial results based on idealized models.
    Su B; Zhang JM; Zou H; Ghista D; Le TT; Chin C
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 Nov; 126():104038. PubMed ID: 33039809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra-Cardiac Flow from Geometry Prescribed Computational Fluid Dynamics: Comparison with Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging.
    Hvid R; Stuart MB; Jensen JA; Traberg MS
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2023 Aug; 14(4):489-504. PubMed ID: 37322241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning.
    Paliwal N; Jaiswal P; Tutino VM; Shallwani H; Davies JM; Siddiqui AH; Rai R; Meng H
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Nov; 45(5):E7. PubMed ID: 30453461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.