These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36354657)

  • 21. The Accuracy of Transferring Casts in Maximal Intercuspal Position to a Virtual Articulator.
    He M; Ding Q; Li L; Yang G; Zhao Y; Sun Y; Zhang L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 34196456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of virtual articulator settings on occlusal morphology of CAD/CAM restorations.
    Olthoff L; Meijer I; de Ruiter W; Bosman F; van der Zel J
    Int J Comput Dent; 2007 Apr; 10(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 17899892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ability of General Dentists and Prosthodontists to Discern and Identify Incremental Increases in Occlusal Vertical Dimension in Dentate Subjects.
    Remiszewski D; Bidra AS; Litt MD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(4):327-333. PubMed ID: 28697201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Occlusal Vertical Dimension: Best Evidence Consensus Statement.
    Goldstein G; Goodacre C; MacGregor K
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(S1):12-19. PubMed ID: 33783090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A mathematical method for calculating the compensating anterior stop pin setting of a semiadjustable arcon articulator.
    Wright WJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Mar; 61(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 2921754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative evaluation of sagittal inclination of the occlusal plane with Frankfort horizontal plane in facebow transfers to semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators.
    Palaskar JN; Joshi N; Gullapalli P; Shah P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 31227235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is there a benefit of using an arbitrary facebow for the fabrication of a stabilization appliance?
    Shodadai SP; Türp JC; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 12066697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recording the trajectory of mouth opening and closing for the fabrication of an occlusal splint.
    Kim JE; Kwon JH; Kim JH; Shim JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 27866699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simulation of dental collisions and occlusal dynamics in the virtual environment.
    Stavness IK; Hannam AG; Tobias DL; Zhang X
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 43(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 26685912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the Kois Dento-Facial Analyzer System with an earbow for mounting a maxillary cast.
    Lux LH; Thompson GA; Waliszewski KJ; Ziebert GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 25979448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Integrating Facial and Intraoral Scans for Digital Esthetic and Occlusal Design: A Technical Report.
    Sun A; Yang Y; Gao H; Lin WS; Chen L; Tan J
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):729-733. PubMed ID: 34109701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An overview of the different digital facebow methods for transferring the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator.
    Revilla-León M; Zeitler JM; Kois JC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38778662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Determining the requirements, section quantity, and dimension of the virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Arias A; Brizuela A; Garikano X; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 26386482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimal Use of Physical Centric Relation Records for Digital Workflows.
    Osnes C; Patel J; Wagstaff A; Ferrari M; Keeling A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Nov; 29(4):223-229. PubMed ID: 34218536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Changes in Lower Facial Height and Facial Esthetics with Incremental Increases in Occlusal Vertical Dimension in Dentate Subjects.
    Orenstein NP; Bidra AS; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Uribe F; Litt MD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 26218018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of transferring analog dental casts to a virtual articulator.
    Úry E; Fornai C; Weber GW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):305-313. PubMed ID: 31227241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Novel Technique to Align the Intraoral Scans to the Virtual Articulator and Set the Patient-Specific Sagittal Condylar Inclination.
    Yang S; Feng N; Li D; Wu Y; Yue L; Yuan Q
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 34170604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The acrylic resin transfer coping technique for making accurate interocclusal records.
    Antonelli J; Hottel TL; Siegel SC; Darnell L
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2011; 91(2):17-21; quiz 22-3. PubMed ID: 21748975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.