These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36356393)
1. When more is less: Adding action effects to reduce crosstalk between concurrently performed tasks. Schacherer J; Hazeltine E Cognition; 2023 Jan; 230():105318. PubMed ID: 36356393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Crosstalk, not resource competition, as a source of dual-task costs: Evidence from manipulating stimulus-action effect conceptual compatibility. Schacherer J; Hazeltine E Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1224-1232. PubMed ID: 33689145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings. Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching. Stephan DN; Koch I Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 26421450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sources of interference in cross-modal action: response selection, crosstalk, and general dual-execution costs. Pieczykolan A; Huestegge L Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):109-120. PubMed ID: 28956154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses. Huestegge L; Koch I J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 19331493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Talking while looking: on the encapsulation of output system representations. Huestegge L; Pieczykolan A; Koch I Cogn Psychol; 2014 Sep; 73():72-91. PubMed ID: 25003309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness. Stelzel C; Schubert T Psychol Res; 2011 Nov; 75(6):476-90. PubMed ID: 21811837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Backward crosstalk and the role of dimensional overlap within and between tasks. Huestegge L; Pieczykolan A; Janczyk M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():139-147. PubMed ID: 29933176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A common source of attention for auditory and visual tracking. Fougnie D; Cockhren J; Marois R Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1571-1583. PubMed ID: 29717471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control. Woollacott M; Vander Velde T Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality. Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28578525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Introspection about backward crosstalk in dual-task performance. Bratzke D; Janczyk M Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):605-617. PubMed ID: 31974636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissociating action-effect activation and effect-based response selection. Schwarz KA; Pfister R; Wirth R; Kunde W Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():16-24. PubMed ID: 29807302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks. Koch I; Rumiati RI Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Action control in task switching: do action effects modulate N - 2 repetition costs in task switching? Schuch S; Sommer A; Lukas S Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 29147794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring the effects of a visual or auditory Stroop task on dual-task costs during obstacle crossing. Worden TA; Mendes M; Singh P; Vallis LA Gait Posture; 2016 Oct; 50():159-163. PubMed ID: 27621085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of extensive dual-task practice on processing stages in simultaneous choice tasks. Strobach T; Liepelt R; Pashler H; Frensch PA; Schubert T Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):900-20. PubMed ID: 23580330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]