173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36357304)
1. Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Breast: Multimodality Imaging Findings and Review of the Literature.
Guldogan N; Esen G; Kayadibi Y; Taskin F; Alfatli AO; Boy FNS; Balci P; Bugdayci O; Tokat F; Ozturk T; Tunaci M; Arikan AE
Acad Radiol; 2023 Jun; 30(6):1107-1117. PubMed ID: 36357304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China.
Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The value of ultrasound classification in BI-RADS category 4 of breast complex cystic masses].
Yao JP; Niu LJ; Wang Y; Geng CY; Chang Q; Chen Y; Zhu L
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 40(9):672-675. PubMed ID: 30293391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple Bilateral Circumscribed Masses at Screening Breast Ultrasound: Outcomes of New or Enlarging Masses at Follow-Up.
Wolfson S; Heller SL; Gao Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Mar; 218(3):435-443. PubMed ID: 34549605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of Ultrasound Features and BI-RADS Categories of Malignant Breast Masses in Women ≤40.
Gity M; Jafari M; Olfatbakhsh A; Rezaei Kalantari K; Hashemi E; Sari F
Arch Iran Med; 2021 May; 24(5):383-389. PubMed ID: 34196203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.
Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS
Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Downgrading of Breast Masses Suspicious for Cancer by Using Optoacoustic Breast Imaging.
Menezes GLG; Pijnappel RM; Meeuwis C; Bisschops R; Veltman J; Lavin PT; van de Vijver MJ; Mann RM
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):355-365. PubMed ID: 29664342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging features of benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast.
Park YM; Park JS; Jung HS; Yoon HK; Yang WT
J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 May; 41(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 23325754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound strain elastography for differentiation of malignant breast lesions.
Georgieva M; Prantl L; Utpatel K; Wiesinger I; Stroszczynski C; Jung F; Jung EM
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 71(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30584133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can Ultrasound Elastography Help Better Manage Mammographic BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions?
Gu Y; Tian J; Ran H; Ren W; Chang C; Yuan J; Kang C; Deng Y; Wang H; Luo B; Guo S; Zhou Q; Xue E; Zhan W; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang C; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu J; Chen W; Zhang Y; Li J; Wang H; Jiang Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Jun; 22(4):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 34815174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging of Intracystic Papillary Carcinoma.
Speer ME; Adrada BE; Arribas EM; Hess KR; Middleton LP; Whitman GJ
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2019; 48(4):348-352. PubMed ID: 30072190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Basal-like Breast Cancer: Comparison of Imaging Characteristics.
Choi BB; Jang HJ; Choi SI
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(3):241-248. PubMed ID: 32133954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiologic Findings of a Rare Subtype of Invasive Breast Cancer with Poor Prognosis: Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast.
Aydin H; Guner B; Bostanci IE; Ciledag N; Bulut MB; Bozgul M; Dilek GB; Aribas BK
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 31989886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Elastography Assisted BI-RADS in the Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging 4a Lesions in China.
Tang L; Wang Y; Gong H; Chen M
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Feb; 42(2):453-461. PubMed ID: 35811402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of ultrasound, cytological, and histological features of 110 benign BI-RADS categories 4C and 5 nonpalpable breast lesions. The Institut Curie's experience.
Farras Roca JA; Tardivon A; Thibault F; Rouzier R; Klijanienko J
Cancer Cytopathol; 2021 Jun; 129(6):479-488. PubMed ID: 33689204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging findings and accuracy of core needle biopsy in mucinous carcinoma of the breast.
Bode MK; Rissanen T
Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 21498339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
