169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36359468)
1. A Logistic Regression Model for Biomechanical Risk Classification in Lifting Tasks.
Donisi L; Cesarelli G; Capodaglio E; Panigazzi M; D'Addio G; Cesarelli M; Amato F
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36359468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Work-Related Risk Assessment According to the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: A Preliminary Study Using a Wearable Inertial Sensor and Machine Learning.
Donisi L; Cesarelli G; Coccia A; Panigazzi M; Capodaglio EM; D'Addio G
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33917206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Capability of Machine Learning Algorithms to Classify Safe and Unsafe Postures during Weight Lifting Tasks Using Inertial Sensors.
Prisco G; Romano M; Esposito F; Cesarelli M; Santone A; Donisi L; Amato F
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 38535000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multiple linear regression approach to extimate lifted load from features extracted from inertial data.
Donisi L; Capodaglio EM; Amitrano F; Cesarelli G; Pagano G; D'Addio G
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2021 Dec; 43(4):373-378. PubMed ID: 35049162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. sEMG Spectral Analysis and Machine Learning Algorithms Are Able to Discriminate Biomechanical Risk Classes Associated with Manual Material Liftings.
Donisi L; Jacob D; Guerrini L; Prisco G; Esposito F; Cesarelli M; Amato F; Gargiulo P
Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 37760205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of a 2D video-based lifting monitor.
Wang X; Hu YH; Lu ML; Radwin RG
Ergonomics; 2019 Aug; 62(8):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 31092146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modification of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Lifting Equation to Determine the Individual Manual Lifting Risk in Malaysia's Manufacturing Industry.
Dawad NA; Yasin SM; Darus A; Jamil AT; Nyi Naing N
Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57747. PubMed ID: 38715993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.
Lu ML; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Davis KG
Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):667-82. PubMed ID: 26822795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring Biomechanical Risk in Lifting Load Tasks Through Wearable System and Machine-Learning Approach.
Conforti I; Mileti I; Del Prete Z; Palermo E
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 32168844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the risk assessment capability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation by incorporating personal characteristics.
Barim MS; Sesek RF; Capanoglu MF; Drinkaus P; Schall MC; Gallagher S; Davis GA
Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():67-73. PubMed ID: 30487111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of the revised NIOSH lifting equation to predict risk of low-back pain associated with manual lifting: a one-year prospective study.
Lu ML; Waters TR; Krieg E; Werren D
Hum Factors; 2014 Feb; 56(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 24669544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical lifting energy consumption in work activities designed by means of the "revised NIOSH lifting equation".
Ranavolo A; Varrecchia T; Rinaldi M; Silvetti A; Serrao M; Conforto S; Draicchio F
Ind Health; 2017 Oct; 55(5):444-454. PubMed ID: 28781290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Weight Generates Different Spine Loads in Load-Handling Activity Performed Using Stoop, Semi-squat and Full-Squat Techniques; a Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model Study.
Dehghan P; Arjmand N
Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1387-1398. PubMed ID: 36433743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variable Lifting Index (VLI): A New Method for Evaluating Variable Lifting Tasks.
Waters T; Occhipinti E; Colombini D; Alvarez-Casado E; Fox R
Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):695-711. PubMed ID: 26646300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Cumulative Lifting Index (CULI) for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: Quantifying Risk for Workers With Job Rotation.
Garg A; Kapellusch JM
Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):683-94. PubMed ID: 26896406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Understanding outcome metrics of the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
Fox RR; Lu ML; Occhipinti E; Jaeger M
Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102897. PubMed ID: 31422239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automation of workplace lifting hazard assessment for musculoskeletal injury prevention.
Spector JT; Lieblich M; Bao S; McQuade K; Hughes M
Ann Occup Environ Med; 2014; 26():15. PubMed ID: 24987523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting the load constant of the revised NIOSH lifting equation based on demographics.
Ahmad S; Muzammil M
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Sep; 29(3):1016-1024. PubMed ID: 35758150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exposures to select risk factors can be estimated from a continuous stream of inertial sensor measurements during a variety of lifting-lowering tasks.
Lim S
Ergonomics; 2024 Apr; ():1-16. PubMed ID: 38646871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revised NIOSH lifting equation: a critical evaluation.
Ahmad S; Muzammil M
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Mar; 29(1):358-365. PubMed ID: 35253606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
