These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36359616)

  • 1. How to Evaluate Theory-Based Hypotheses in Meta-Analysis Using an AIC-Type Criterion.
    Kuiper RM
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Oct; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 36359616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of inequality constrained hypotheses using a generalization of the AIC.
    Altinisik Y; Van Lissa CJ; Hoijtink H; Oldehinkel AJ; Kuiper RM
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Oct; 26(5):599-621. PubMed ID: 34855431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Properties of hypothesis testing techniques and (Bayesian) model selection for exploration-based and theory-based (order-restricted) hypotheses.
    Kuiper RM; Nederhoff T; Klugkist I
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):220-45. PubMed ID: 24975402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating a theory-based hypothesis against its complement using an AIC-type information criterion with an application to facial burn injury.
    Vanbrabant L; Van Loey N; Kuiper RM
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):129-142. PubMed ID: 31670538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Moving beyond traditional null hypothesis testing: evaluating expectations directly.
    de Schoot RV; Hoijtink H; Jan-Willem R
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():24. PubMed ID: 21713172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).
    Vrieze SI
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):228-43. PubMed ID: 22309957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Akaike's information theoretic criterion in mixed-effects modeling of pharmacokinetic data: a simulation study.
    Olofsen E; Dahan A
    F1000Res; 2013; 2():71. PubMed ID: 26673949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria.
    Dziak JJ; Coffman DL; Lanza ST; Li R; Jermiin LS
    Brief Bioinform; 2020 Mar; 21(2):553-565. PubMed ID: 30895308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating order-constrained hypotheses for circular data from a between-within subjects design.
    Baayen C; Klugkist I
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Sep; 19(3):398-408. PubMed ID: 25046448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes.
    Lin L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204056. PubMed ID: 30212588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The AIC model selection method applied to path analytic models compared using a d-separation test.
    Shipley B
    Ecology; 2013 Mar; 94(3):560-4. PubMed ID: 23687881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An empirical comparison of information-theoretic selection criteria for multivariate behavior genetic models.
    Markon KE; Krueger RF
    Behav Genet; 2004 Nov; 34(6):593-610. PubMed ID: 15520516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An omnibus test for the global null hypothesis.
    Futschik A; Taus T; Zehetmayer S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2292-2304. PubMed ID: 29635962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Errors in Statistical Inference Under Model Misspecification: Evidence, Hypothesis Testing, and AIC.
    Dennis B; Ponciano JM; Taper ML; Lele SR
    Front Ecol Evol; 2019; 7():. PubMed ID: 34295904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Akaike's Information Criterion and Recent Developments in Information Complexity.
    Bozdogan H
    J Math Psychol; 2000 Mar; 44(1):62-91. PubMed ID: 10733858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating the performance of AIC in selecting phylogenetic models.
    Jhwueng DC; Huzurbazar S; O'Meara BC; Liu L
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2014 Aug; 13(4):459-75. PubMed ID: 24867284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constrained statistical inference: sample-size tables for ANOVA and regression.
    Vanbrabant L; Van De Schoot R; Rosseel Y
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1565. PubMed ID: 25628587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parsimonious model selection using information theory: a modified selection rule.
    Yates LA; Richards SA; Brook BW
    Ecology; 2021 Oct; 102(10):e03475. PubMed ID: 34272730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha to evaluate informative hypotheses.
    Okada K
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Dec; 6(4):333-46. PubMed ID: 26123160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.