These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36359683)

  • 1. Testing the Intercept of a Balanced Predictive Regression Model.
    Wang Q; Liu X; Fan Y; Peng L
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Nov; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 36359683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimum methadone compliance testing: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(21):1-54. PubMed ID: 23074492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A non-parametric statistic for testing conditional heteroscedasticity for unobserved component models.
    Rodriguez A; Pino G; Herrera R
    J Appl Stat; 2021; 48(3):471-497. PubMed ID: 35706534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing homogeneity in semiparametric mixture case-control models.
    Di CZ; Chan KCG; Zheng C; Liang KY
    Commun Stat Theory Methods; 2017; 46(18):9092-9100. PubMed ID: 29725157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The optimal power puzzle: scrutiny of the monotone likelihood ratio assumption in multiple testing.
    Cao H; Sun W; Kosorok MR
    Biometrika; 2013; 100(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 24733954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A bootstrap version of the Hausman test to assess the impact of cluster-level endogeneity beyond the random intercept model.
    Talloen W; Loeys T; Moerkerke B
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 30663379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longitudinal Joint Modelling of Ordinal and Overdispersed Count Outcomes: A Bridge Distribution for the Ordinal Random Intercept.
    Amini P; Moghimbeigi A; Zayeri F; Tapak L; Maroufizadeh S; Verbeke G
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2021; 2021():5521881. PubMed ID: 33763151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of likelihood ratio tests and Rao's score test for three separable covariance matrix structures.
    Filipiak K; Klein D; Roy A
    Biom J; 2017 Jan; 59(1):192-215. PubMed ID: 27774639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for Serial Correlation in Autoregressive Exogenous Models with Possible GARCH Errors.
    Li H; Liu X; Chen Y; Fan Y
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Aug; 24(8):. PubMed ID: 36010740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A weighted generalized score statistic for comparison of predictive values of diagnostic tests.
    Kosinski AS
    Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(6):964-77. PubMed ID: 22912343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Default Priors for the Intercept Parameter in Logistic Regressions.
    Boonstra PS; Barbaro RP; Sen A
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2019 May; 133():245-256. PubMed ID: 31530966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction models for clustered data: comparison of a random intercept and standard regression model.
    Bouwmeester W; Twisk JW; Kappen TH; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Vergouwe Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Feb; 13():19. PubMed ID: 23414436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heteroscedastic one-factor models and marginal maximum likelihood estimation.
    Hessen DJ; Dolan CV
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):57-77. PubMed ID: 17935662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferential tools in penalized logistic regression for small and sparse data: A comparative study.
    Siino M; Fasola S; Muggeo VM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1365-1375. PubMed ID: 27510370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doubly multivariate linear models with block exchangeable distributed errors and site-dependent covariates.
    Opheim T; Roy A
    J Appl Stat; 2022; 49(14):3659-3676. PubMed ID: 36246862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the finite sample distribution of the likelihood ratio statistic for testing heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Kuk S; Lee W
    Biom J; 2020 Dec; 62(8):1986-1996. PubMed ID: 32754910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study on the unified model based multifactor dimensionality reduction methods for identifying gene-gene interactions associated with the survival phenotype.
    Lee JW; Lee S
    BioData Min; 2021 Mar; 14(1):17. PubMed ID: 33648540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Permutation and Bayesian tests for testing random effects in linear mixed-effects models.
    Rao K; Drikvandi R; Saville B
    Stat Med; 2019 Nov; 38(25):5034-5047. PubMed ID: 31460683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Random intercept and linear mixed models including heteroscedasticity in a logarithmic scale: Correction terms and prediction in the original scale.
    Ramírez-Aldana R; Naranjo L
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249910. PubMed ID: 33852635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.