These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 363676)

  • 1. Comparative accuracy of five biochemical systems for identifying Salmonella and related foodborne bacteria: collaborative study.
    Poelma PL; Romero A; Andrews WH
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1978 Sep; 61(5):1043-9. PubMed ID: 363676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multitest system for biochemical identification of Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and other Enterobacteriaceae isolated from foods: collaborative study.
    Keelan SL; Flowers RS; Robison BJ
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1988; 71(5):968-72. PubMed ID: 3069833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gram-negative identification card for identification of Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and other Enterobacteriaceae isolated from foods: collaborative study.
    Knight MT; Wood DW; Black JF; Gosney G; Rigney RO; Agin JR; Gravens CK; Farnham SM
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1990; 73(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 2272996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Salmonellae and food safety.
    Tietjen M; Fung DY
    Crit Rev Microbiol; 1995; 21(1):53-83. PubMed ID: 7576151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fluorescent antibody method for the detection of Salmonella: development, evaluation, and collaborative study.
    Fantasia LD; Schrade JP; Yager JF; Debler D
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1975 Jul; 58(4):828-44. PubMed ID: 1097387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P; Carbone M; Fera MT; Teti G
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Micro-ID, a modified Minitek system, and conventional methods for four-hour identification of Enterobacteriacae directly from blood cultures.
    Wellstood S
    Am J Med Technol; 1982 Sep; 48(9):769-73. PubMed ID: 6753582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in the API 20E biochemical patterns of clinical and environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates.
    Martinez-Urtaza J; Lozano-Leon A; Viña-Feas A; de Novoa J; Garcia-Martin O
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2006 Feb; 255(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 16436064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Minitec and API as rapid diagnostic methods for anaerobic bacteria.
    Bergan T; Vangdal M; Salveson A
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1984; 91():103-11. PubMed ID: 6377470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative efficiency of brilliant green, bismuth sulfite, Salmonella-Shigella, hektoen enteric, and xylose lysine desoxycholate agars for the recovery of Salmonella from foods: collaborative study.
    Andrews WH; Poelma PL; Wilson CR
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1981 Jul; 64(4):899-928. PubMed ID: 7275908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immunodiffusion screening method for detection of motile Salmonella in foods: collaborative study.
    Flowers RS; Klatt MJ
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1989; 72(2):303-11. PubMed ID: 2496098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A comparison of manual methods and enterotube II (Roche) for the identification of gram-negative enteric bacteria isolated from feces].
    Hasçelik G
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 1987 Oct; 21(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 3332703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of two real-time polymerase chain reaction pathogen detection kits for Salmonella spp. in food.
    Cheung PY; Chan CW; Wong W; Cheung TL; Kam KM
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2004; 39(6):509-15. PubMed ID: 15548303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of API-10s and Minitek with conventional biochemical tests (author's transl)].
    Stanek G; Hirschl A; Rotter M
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Feb; 246(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 6999781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of the Autoscan-4 System for the identification of strains of the genus Salmonella].
    Usera MA; Echeita A
    Microbiologia; 1991 Jun; 7(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 1867778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A single-tube screen for Salmonella and Shigella.
    Procop GW; Wallace JD; Tuohy MJ; Lasalvia MM; Addison RM; Reller LB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Aug; 130(2):284-9. PubMed ID: 18628099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of Salmonella in onion and garlic powders: collaborative study.
    Andrews WH; Wagner D; Roetting MJ
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1979 May; 62(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 479071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of BAX system, Tecra Unique Salmonella test, and a conventional culture method for the detection of Salmonella in ready-to-eat and raw foods.
    Cheung PY; Kwok KK; Kam KM
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Jul; 103(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 17584468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of two miniaturized systems widely used in the laboratories for the identification of the "Enterobacteriaceae" (author's transl)].
    Santini GF; Crovatto M; Chiaradia V; Marchi MP
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1979 Mar; 15(1):78-102. PubMed ID: 396548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of biochemical and molecular methods for the identification of bacterial isolates associated with failed loggerhead sea turtle eggs.
    Awong-Taylor J; Craven KS; Griffiths L; Bass C; Muscarella M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2008 May; 104(5):1244-51. PubMed ID: 18028359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.