These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 363676)

  • 41. Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes.
    Hansen SL; Stewart BJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Sep; 4(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of a commercial identification kit and conventional biochemical tests used for the identification of enteric gram-negative rods.
    McCarthy LR; Mayo JB; Bell G; Armstrong D
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1978 Feb; 69(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 343571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Checking the reliability of the PathoTec biochemical test system for bacterial identification].
    Khomenko NA
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1977 Apr; (4):42-6. PubMed ID: 325964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Selecting a Miniaturized System for Identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Cox NA; Fung DYC; Goldschmidt MC; Bailey JS; Thomson JE
    J Food Prot; 1984 Jan; 47(1):74-77. PubMed ID: 30925651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of the Minitek system for characterization of Bacillus species.
    Sullivan NM; Mills DC; Riemann HP; Arnon SS
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 Nov; 53(11):2680-2. PubMed ID: 3322194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Kit systems for identifying gram negative aerobic bacilli: report of the Welsh Standing Specialist Advisory Working Group in Microbiology.
    Bennett CH; Joynson DH
    J Clin Pathol; 1986 Jun; 39(6):666-71. PubMed ID: 3522638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [The NEFERM-Test for identification of psychrotrophic bacteria in food].
    Urbanová E; Pácová Z
    Vet Med (Praha); 1995 May; 40(5):151-5. PubMed ID: 7793017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of Four ONPG Tests for Enterobacteriaceae from Human, Animal and Selected Food Sources.
    Cox NA; Mercuri AJ
    J Food Prot; 1977 Oct; 40(10):709-711. PubMed ID: 30736238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of five test-kits-API, AuxoTab, Enterotube, PathoTec and R-B-for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Nord CE; Lindberg AA; Dahlbäck A
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1974 Mar; 159(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 4830936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Commercial Assay Systems for Detecting Foodborne Salmonella : A Review.
    Feng P
    J Food Prot; 1992 Nov; 55(11):927-934. PubMed ID: 31084060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [ON THE DEPENDENCE OF THE DEMONSTRATION OF SALMONELLA ON THE INCUBATION PERIOD OF TEST SPECIMENS IN ENRICHED CULTURES].
    SEIDEL G; KOEHLER W
    Dtsch Gesundheitsw; 1964 May; 19():887-9. PubMed ID: 14228338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Rapid Microbial Identification Systems in the Food Industry: Present and Future
    Fung DYC; Cox NA
    J Food Prot; 1981 Nov; 44(11):877-880. PubMed ID: 30856747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [On the problem of current methods of identifying Salmonella. I. Results of the study of cultures difficult to identify].
    ARBUZOVA VA
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1963 Feb; 40():8-13. PubMed ID: 14013592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The visual identification of V and W form colonies in Salmonella cultures.
    LANDY M
    Public Health Rep (1896); 1950 Jul; 65(30):950-1. PubMed ID: 15441030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. On the biochemical behavior of new Salmonella types.
    KAUFFMANN F
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand; 1958; 43(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 13544936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Use of a "U" Tube for the Isolation of Monophasic Varieties from Diphasic Salmonella Cultures.
    Hajna AA
    J Bacteriol; 1944 Nov; 48(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 16560873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative accuracy of five biochemical systems for identifying Salmonella and related foodborne bacteria: collaborative study.
    Poelma PL; Romero A; Andrews WH
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1978 Sep; 61(5):1043-9. PubMed ID: 363676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Multitest system for biochemical identification of Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and other Enterobacteriaceae isolated from foods: collaborative study.
    Keelan SL; Flowers RS; Robison BJ
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1988; 71(5):968-72. PubMed ID: 3069833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Gram-negative identification card for identification of Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and other Enterobacteriaceae isolated from foods: collaborative study.
    Knight MT; Wood DW; Black JF; Gosney G; Rigney RO; Agin JR; Gravens CK; Farnham SM
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1990; 73(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 2272996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Salmonellae and food safety.
    Tietjen M; Fung DY
    Crit Rev Microbiol; 1995; 21(1):53-83. PubMed ID: 7576151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.