BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36367656)

  • 1. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): thresholds for the EQ-5D-5L and Oxford hip and knee scores for patients with total hip and knee replacement.
    Conner-Spady BL; Marshall DA; Bohm E; Dunbar MJ; Loucks L; Noseworthy TW
    Qual Life Res; 2023 Feb; 32(2):519-530. PubMed ID: 36367656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement.
    Conner-Spady BL; Marshall DA; Bohm E; Dunbar MJ; Noseworthy TW
    Qual Life Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1311-1322. PubMed ID: 29423757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Associations between preoperative Oxford hip and knee scores and costs and quality of life of patients undergoing primary total joint replacement in the NHS England: an observational study.
    Eibich P; Dakin HA; Price AJ; Beard D; Arden NK; Gray AM
    BMJ Open; 2018 Apr; 8(4):e019477. PubMed ID: 29643154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in patients following total hip or knee replacement.
    Jin X; Al Sayah F; Ohinmaa A; Marshall DA; Johnson JA
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Sep; 28(9):2409-2417. PubMed ID: 31089988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mapping analysis to predict EQ-5D-5 L utility values based on the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaires in the Spanish population suffering from lower limb osteoarthritis.
    Martín-Fernández J; Morey-Montalvo M; Tomás-García N; Martín-Ramos E; Muñoz-García JC; Polentinos-Castro E; Rodríguez-Martínez G; Arenaza JC; García-Pérez L; Magdalena-Armas L; Bilbao A
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Jun; 18(1):184. PubMed ID: 32539838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How do Patient-reported Outcome Scores in International Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries Compare?
    Ingelsrud LH; Wilkinson JM; Overgaard S; Rolfson O; Hallstrom B; Navarro RA; Terner M; Karmakar-Hore S; Webster G; Slawomirski L; Sayers A; Kendir C; de Bienassis K; Klazinga N; Dahl AW; Bohm E
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1884-1896. PubMed ID: 35901444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who Benefits From Hip Arthroplasty or Knee Arthroplasty? Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Thresholds Predict Meaningful Improvement.
    Langenberger B; Steinbeck V; Busse R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 May; 482(5):867-881. PubMed ID: 38393816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient acceptable symptom state and treatment failure threshold values for work productivity and activity Impairment and EQ-5D-5L in osteoarthritis.
    Kiadaliri A; Cronström A; Dahlberg LE; Lohmander LS
    Qual Life Res; 2024 May; 33(5):1257-1266. PubMed ID: 38409279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is the association between gender and self-perceived health status when controlling for disease-specific conditions? A retrospective data analysis of pre- and post-operative EQ-5D-5L differences in total hip and knee arthroplasty.
    Bischof AY; Steinbeck V; Kuklinski D; Marques CJ; Bohlen K; Westphal KC; Lampe F; Geissler A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Nov; 24(1):914. PubMed ID: 38012614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS stand-alone component and Oxford knee score in the Australian knee arthroplasty population utilising minimally important difference, concurrent validity, predictive validity and responsiveness.
    Lin DY; Cheok TS; Kaambwa B; Samson AJ; Morrison C; Chan T; Kroon HM; Jaarsma RL
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 May; 21(1):41. PubMed ID: 37165364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient acceptable symptom states after totalhip or knee replacement at mid-term follow-up: Thresholds of the Oxford hip and knee scores.
    Keurentjes JC; Van Tol FR; Fiocco M; So-Osman C; Onstenk R; Koopman-Van Gemert AW; Pöll RG; Nelissen RG
    Bone Joint Res; 2014; 3(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 24421318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of EQ-5D, howRu and Oxford hip & knee scores in assessing the outcome of hip and knee replacements.
    Benson T; Williams DH; Potts HW
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Sep; 16(1):512. PubMed ID: 27659761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5d poorly predict patient's satisfaction following mechanically aligned total knee replacement: A cross-sectional study.
    Gummaraju A; Maillot C; Baryeh K; Villet L; Rivière C
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 May; 107(3):102867. PubMed ID: 33639287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L, the Oxford Hip Score, and the Oxford Knee Score in the NHS patient-reported outcome measures.
    Kang S
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Jan; 16(1):18. PubMed ID: 33413483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of rheumatoid arthritis on patient-reported outcomes following knee and hip replacement: evidence from routinely collected data.
    Burn E; Edwards CJ; Murray DW; Silman A; Cooper C; Arden NK; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Prieto-Alhambra D
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2019 Jun; 58(6):1016-1024. PubMed ID: 30608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine tool to select candidates for hip and knee replacement surgery: development and economic modelling.
    Price A; Smith J; Dakin H; Kang S; Eibich P; Cook J; Gray A; Harris K; Middleton R; Gibbons E; Benedetto E; Smith S; Dawson J; Fitzpatrick R; Sayers A; Miller L; Marques E; Gooberman-Hill R; Blom A; Judge A; Arden N; Murray D; Glyn-Jones S; Barker K; Carr A; Beard D
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(32):1-216. PubMed ID: 31287051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of a digital joint school educational programme on post-operative outcomes following lower limb arthroplasty: a retrospective comparative cohort study.
    Gray J; McCarthy S; Carr E; Danjoux G; Hackett R; McCarthy A; McMeekin P; Clark N; Baker P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Apr; 22(1):580. PubMed ID: 35488258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Does the New Australian EQ-5D-5L Value Set Impact Utility Scores? Analysis of Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Ackerman IN; Norman R; Harris IA; Cashman K; Lorimer M; Gill S; Lewis P; Soh SE
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38878238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating change using patient-reported outcome measures in knee replacement: the complementary nature of the EQ-5D index and VAS scores.
    Lin FJ; Samp J; Munoz A; Wong PS; Pickard AS
    Eur J Health Econ; 2014 Jun; 15(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 23765331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement.
    Conner-Spady BL; Marshall DA; Bohm E; Dunbar MJ; Loucks L; Al Khudairy A; Noseworthy TW
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Jul; 24(7):1775-84. PubMed ID: 25555837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.