These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36368559)

  • 1. Excitatory and inhibitory interactions affect the balance of chorus activity and energy efficiency in the aggregations of male frogs: Numerical simulations using a hybrid dynamical model.
    Aihara I; Kominami D; Hosokawa Y; Murata M
    J Theor Biol; 2023 Feb; 558():111352. PubMed ID: 36368559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial release from masking improves sound pattern discrimination along a biologically relevant pulse-rate continuum in gray treefrogs.
    Ward JL; Buerkle NP; Bee MA
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():63-75. PubMed ID: 24055623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Steroid hormone levels in calling males and males practicing alternative non-calling mating tactics in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea.
    Leary CJ; Harris S
    Horm Behav; 2013 Jan; 63(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 23160001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phonotaxis to male's calls embedded within a chorus by female gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor.
    Christie K; Schul J; Feng AS
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2010 Aug; 196(8):569-79. PubMed ID: 20577882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biotic and abiotic sounds affect calling activity but not plasma testosterone levels in male frogs (Batrachyla taeniata) in the field and in captivity.
    Muñoz MI; Quispe M; Maliqueo M; Penna M
    Horm Behav; 2020 Feb; 118():104605. PubMed ID: 31644890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Female Preferences for More Elaborate Signals Are an Emergent Outcome of Male Chorusing Interactions in Túngara Frogs.
    Larter LC; Ryan MJ
    Am Nat; 2024 Jan; 203(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 38207138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are frog calls relatively difficult to locate by mammalian predators?
    Jones DL; Ratnam R
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 36508005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dual benefits of synchronized mating signals in a Japanese treefrog: attracting mates and manipulating predators.
    Legett HD; Aihara I; Bernal XE
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Oct; 376(1835):20200340. PubMed ID: 34420389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forebrain arginine vasotocin correlates of alternative mating strategies in cricket frogs.
    Marler CA; Boyd SK; Wilczynski W
    Horm Behav; 1999 Aug; 36(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 10433886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social signals influence hormones independently of calling behavior in the treefrog (Hyla cinerea).
    Burmeister S; Wilczynski W
    Horm Behav; 2000 Dec; 38(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 11104638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mating vocalizations of female frogs: control and evolutionary mechanisms.
    Emerson SB; Boyd SK
    Brain Behav Evol; 1999; 53(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 10343085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glucocorticoids, androgens, testis mass, and the energetics of vocalization in breeding male frogs.
    Emerson SB; Hess DL
    Horm Behav; 2001 Feb; 39(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 11161884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calling is an honest indicator of paternal genetic quality in poison frogs.
    Forsman A; Hagman M
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):2148-57. PubMed ID: 17133871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Success breeds success in mating male reed frogs (Hyperolius marmoratus).
    Dyson ML; Henzi SP; Halliday TR; Barrett L
    Proc Biol Sci; 1998 Aug; 265(1404):1417-21. PubMed ID: 9721688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complex and transitive synchronization in a frustrated system of calling frogs.
    Aihara I; Takeda R; Mizumoto T; Otsuka T; Takahashi T; Okuno HG; Aihara K
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Mar; 83(3 Pt 1):031913. PubMed ID: 21517531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A sound worth saving: acoustic characteristics of a massive fish spawning aggregation.
    Erisman BE; Rowell TJ
    Biol Lett; 2017 Dec; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 29263130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproductive hormones modify reception of species-typical communication signals in a female anuran.
    Lynch KS; Wilczynski W
    Brain Behav Evol; 2008; 71(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 18032889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vocal communication in frogs.
    Kelley DB
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2004 Dec; 14(6):751-7. PubMed ID: 15582379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual contributions to group chorus dynamics influence access to mating opportunities in wood frogs.
    Calsbeek R; Zamora-Camacho FJ; Symes LB
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Jun; 25(6):1401-1409. PubMed ID: 35305074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise.
    Bee MA; Schwartz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2788-801. PubMed ID: 19894854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.