These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36368984)
1. What outcomes of moral case deliberations are perceived important for healthcare professionals to handle moral challenges? A national cross-sectional study in paediatric oncology. Bartholdson C; Billstein I; Molewijk B; Pergert P BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):108. PubMed ID: 36368984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptions of important outcomes of moral case deliberations: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care. Weiner C; Pergert P; Molewijk B; Castor A; Bartholdson C BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):27. PubMed ID: 33731101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Moral competence, moral teamwork and moral action - the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcomes (Euro-MCD) Instrument 2.0 and its revision process. de Snoo-Trimp JC; de Vet HCW; Widdershoven GAM; Molewijk AC; Svantesson M BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):53. PubMed ID: 32616048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Important outcomes of moral case deliberation: a Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals' priorities. Svantesson M; de Snoo-Trimp JC; Ursin G; de Vet HC; Brinchmann BS; Molewijk B J Med Ethics; 2019 Sep; 45(9):608-616. PubMed ID: 31320403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What Outcomes do Dutch Healthcare Professionals Perceive as Important Before Participation in Moral Case Deliberation? de Snoo-Trimp J; Widdershoven G; Svantesson M; de Vet R; Molewijk B Bioethics; 2017 May; 31(4):246-257. PubMed ID: 28417518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Field-Testing the Euro-MCD Instrument: Important Outcomes According to Participants Before and After Moral Case Deliberation. de Snoo-Trimp JC; Molewijk AC; Svantesson M; Widdershoven GAM; de Vet HCW HEC Forum; 2022 Mar; 34(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 32770330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Field-testing the Euro-MCD Instrument: Experienced outcomes of moral case deliberation. de Snoo-Trimp JC; Molewijk B; Ursin G; Brinchmann BS; Widdershoven GA; de Vet HC; Svantesson M Nurs Ethics; 2020 Mar; 27(2):390-406. PubMed ID: 31177947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of moral case deliberation--the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD). Svantesson M; Karlsson J; Boitte P; Schildman J; Dauwerse L; Widdershoven G; Pedersen R; Huisman M; Molewijk B BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Apr; 15():30. PubMed ID: 24712735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Important situations that capture moral distress in paediatric oncology. Af Sandeberg M; Bartholdson C; Pergert P BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):6. PubMed ID: 31931787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing an ethics support tool for dealing with dilemmas around client autonomy based on moral case deliberations. Hartman LA; Metselaar S; Molewijk AC; Edelbroek HM; Widdershoven GAM BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Dec; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 30577790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining and categorizing outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation (MCD): concept mapping with experienced MCD participants. de Snoo-Trimp JC; Molewijk B; de Vet HCW BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):88. PubMed ID: 30454047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Moral distress in paediatric oncology: Contributing factors and group differences. Pergert P; Bartholdson C; Blomgren K; Af Sandeberg M Nurs Ethics; 2019; 26(7-8):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 30411660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of moral case deliberation at the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate: a pilot study. Seekles W; Widdershoven G; Robben P; van Dalfsen G; Molewijk B BMC Med Ethics; 2016 May; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27209161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Difficult situations and moral questions raised during moral case deliberations in Swedish childhood cancer care - A qualitative nationwide study. Weiner C; Pergert P; Castor A; Molewijk B; Bartholdson C Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2022 Oct; 60():102189. PubMed ID: 36087382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relational autonomy in the care of the vulnerable: health care professionals' reasoning in Moral Case Deliberation (MCD). Heidenreich K; Bremer A; Materstvedt LJ; Tidefelt U; Svantesson M Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Dec; 21(4):467-477. PubMed ID: 29243015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does participation in ethics discussions have an impact on ethics decision-making? A cross-sectional study among healthcare professionals in paediatric oncology. Bartholdson C; Sandeberg MA; Molewijk B; Pergert P Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2021 Jun; 52():101950. PubMed ID: 33862416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the Quality of the Deliberation in Moral Case Deliberations: A Coding Scheme. Jellema H; Kremer S; Mackor AR; Molewijk B Bioethics; 2017 May; 31(4):277-285. PubMed ID: 28417521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of moral case deliberation in healthcare settings: a literature review. Haan MM; van Gurp JLP; Naber SM; Groenewoud AS BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):85. PubMed ID: 30400913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. It's not all about moral reasoning: Understanding the content of Moral Case Deliberation. Svantesson M; Silén M; James I Nurs Ethics; 2018 Mar; 25(2):212-229. PubMed ID: 28421865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Healthcare professionals' perceptions of the ethical climate in paediatric cancer care. Bartholdson C; Sandeberg MA; Lützén K; Blomgren K; Pergert P Nurs Ethics; 2016 Dec; 23(8):877-888. PubMed ID: 26116632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]