186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36369185)
1. Seeking vasectomy in post-Dobbs America: the male counterpart response to the reversal of Roe v Wade as evidenced by Google search trends.
Sax MR
Fertil Steril; 2022 Dec; 118(6):1189. PubMed ID: 36369185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. United States vasectomy incidence rises after the reversal of Roe v. Wade in a national clinical and claims database.
Zhang TR; Able C; Ramasamy R; Kohn TP
Fertil Steril; 2023 Jul; 120(1):196-197. PubMed ID: 36967058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. (Re)criminalizing Abortion: Returning to the Political with Stories.
Annas GJ
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 38088615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The End of
Ziegler M
Am J Bioeth; 2022 Aug; 22(8):16-21. PubMed ID: 35593911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the
Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States.
Bole R; Lundy SD; Pei E; Bajic P; Parekh N; Vij SC
Int J Impot Res; 2024 May; 36(3):265-268. PubMed ID: 36788351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
Häyry M
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):434-442. PubMed ID: 36202776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protecting Health after Dobbs.
Clark BR
Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Nov; 52(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 36537270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care.
Feinberg EC; Kawwass JF; Cedars MI
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 140(4):557-559. PubMed ID: 35861359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding the Disconnection between Perceptions of Abortion Acceptability and Support for Roe v. Wade among US Adults.
Buyuker BE; LaRoche KJ; Bueno X; Jozkowski KN; Crawford BL; Turner RC; Lo WJ
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):649-678. PubMed ID: 36693179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From
Owens JA; Lilly FRW; Allen A; Falcon M; Ward RJ
Am J Public Health; 2023 Dec; 113(12):1241-1243. PubMed ID: 37939341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.
Vinekar K; Karlapudi A; Nathan L; Turk JK; Rible R; Steinauer J
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 35852261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induced termination of pregnancy before and after Roe v Wade. Trends in the mortality and morbidity of women. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.
JAMA; 1992 Dec; 268(22):3231-9. PubMed ID: 1433765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What overturning
Compton S; Greer SL
BMJ; 2022 May; 377():o1255. PubMed ID: 35589112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 3.
Holman EJ
JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 4741028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Dangerous Threat to
; ; ; ; ;
N Engl J Med; 2019 Sep; 381(10):979. PubMed ID: 31483971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Editorial Board condemns the overturning of Roe v Wade.
Contraception; 2022 Aug; 112():1. PubMed ID: 35779577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Global implications of overturning Roe
Singh S; Sedgh G
BMJ; 2022 Aug; 378():o2025. PubMed ID: 35981723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Overturning Roe v Wade: reproducing injustice.
Sun N;
BMJ; 2022 Jun; 377():o1588. PubMed ID: 35760441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
