225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36369227)
1. Benchmarking second and third-generation sequencing platforms for microbial metagenomics.
Meslier V; Quinquis B; Da Silva K; Plaza Oñate F; Pons N; Roume H; Podar M; Almeida M
Sci Data; 2022 Nov; 9(1):694. PubMed ID: 36369227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shotgun metagenome data of a defined mock community using Oxford Nanopore, PacBio and Illumina technologies.
Sevim V; Lee J; Egan R; Clum A; Hundley H; Lee J; Everroad RC; Detweiler AM; Bebout BM; Pett-Ridge J; Göker M; Murray AE; Lindemann SR; Klenk HP; O'Malley R; Zane M; Cheng JF; Copeland A; Daum C; Singer E; Woyke T
Sci Data; 2019 Nov; 6(1):285. PubMed ID: 31772173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benchmarking genome assembly methods on metagenomic sequencing data.
Zhang Z; Yang C; Veldsman WP; Fang X; Zhang L
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Mar; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36917471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets.
Portik DM; Brown CT; Pierce-Ward NT
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Dec; 23(1):541. PubMed ID: 36513983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relative Performance of MinION (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) versus Sequel (Pacific Biosciences) Third-Generation Sequencing Instruments in Identification of Agricultural and Forest Fungal Pathogens.
Loit K; Adamson K; Bahram M; Puusepp R; Anslan S; Kiiker R; Drenkhan R; Tedersoo L
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Nov; 85(21):. PubMed ID: 31444199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-read based de novo assembly of low-complexity metagenome samples results in finished genomes and reveals insights into strain diversity and an active phage system.
Somerville V; Lutz S; Schmid M; Frei D; Moser A; Irmler S; Frey JE; Ahrens CH
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):143. PubMed ID: 31238873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assembly methods for nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing: a comparative study.
Latorre-Pérez A; Villalba-Bermell P; Pascual J; Vilanova C
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13588. PubMed ID: 32788623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recovery and Analysis of Long-Read Metagenome-Assembled Genomes.
Arumugam K; Bessarab I; Haryono MAS; Williams RBH
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2649():235-259. PubMed ID: 37258866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comprehensive benchmarking study of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA community profiling.
D'Amore R; Ijaz UZ; Schirmer M; Kenny JG; Gregory R; Darby AC; Shakya M; Podar M; Quince C; Hall N
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():55. PubMed ID: 26763898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing the advantages and disadvantages of short- and long- read eukaryotic metagenomics using simulated reads.
Pearman WS; Freed NE; Silander OK
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 21(1):220. PubMed ID: 32471343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison Between Full-Length 16S rRNA Metabarcoding and Whole Metagenome Sequencing Suggests the Use of Either Is Suitable for Large-Scale Microbiome Studies.
Rubiola S; Macori G; Civera T; Fanning S; Mitchell M; Chiesa F
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2022 Jul; 19(7):495-504. PubMed ID: 35819265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metagenomics methods for the study of plant-associated microbial communities: A review.
Fadiji AE; Babalola OO
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Mar; 170():105860. PubMed ID: 32027927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microbial community analysis using high-throughput sequencing technology: a beginner's guide for microbiologists.
Jo J; Oh J; Park C
J Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(3):176-192. PubMed ID: 32108314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The newest Oxford Nanopore R10.4.1 full-length 16S rRNA sequencing enables the accurate resolution of species-level microbial community profiling.
Zhang T; Li H; Ma S; Cao J; Liao H; Huang Q; Chen W
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2023 Oct; 89(10):e0060523. PubMed ID: 37800969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultra-deep, long-read nanopore sequencing of mock microbial community standards.
Nicholls SM; Quick JC; Tang S; Loman NJ
Gigascience; 2019 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 31089679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization and simulation of metagenomic nanopore sequencing data with Meta-NanoSim.
Yang C; Lo T; Nip KM; Hafezqorani S; Warren RL; Birol I
Gigascience; 2023 Mar; 12():. PubMed ID: 36939007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comprehensive investigation of metagenome assembly by linked-read sequencing.
Zhang L; Fang X; Liao H; Zhang Z; Zhou X; Han L; Chen Y; Qiu Q; Li SC
Microbiome; 2020 Nov; 8(1):156. PubMed ID: 33176883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Illumina versus Nanopore 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of the Human Nasal Microbiota.
Heikema AP; Horst-Kreft D; Boers SA; Jansen R; Hiltemann SD; de Koning W; Kraaij R; de Ridder MAJ; van Houten CB; Bont LJ; Stubbs AP; Hays JP
Genes (Basel); 2020 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 32967250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
