204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36371081)
1. Comparison of CT noise reduction performances with deep learning-based, conventional, and combined denoising algorithms.
Balogh ZA; Janos Kis B
Med Eng Phys; 2022 Nov; 109():103897. PubMed ID: 36371081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pediatric evaluations for deep learning CT denoising.
Nelson BJ; Kc P; Badal A; Jiang L; Masters SC; Zeng R
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):978-990. PubMed ID: 38127330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptive nonlocal means filtering based on local noise level for CT denoising.
Li Z; Yu L; Trzasko JD; Lake DS; Blezek DJ; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH; Manduca A
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011908. PubMed ID: 24387516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm.
Solomon J; Lyu P; Marin D; Samei E
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3961-3971. PubMed ID: 32506661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of a deep learning-based CT image denoising method: Generalizability over dose, reconstruction kernel, and slice thickness.
Zeng R; Lin CY; Li Q; Jiang L; Skopec M; Fessler JA; Myers KJ
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):836-853. PubMed ID: 34954845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deep Learning Reconstruction at CT: Phantom Study of the Image Characteristics.
Higaki T; Nakamura Y; Zhou J; Yu Z; Nemoto T; Tatsugami F; Awai K
Acad Radiol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 31818389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low-Dose Abdominal CT Using a Deep Learning-Based Denoising Algorithm: A Comparison with CT Reconstructed with Filtered Back Projection or Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.
Shin YJ; Chang W; Ye JC; Kang E; Oh DY; Lee YJ; Park JH; Kim YH
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 21(3):356-364. PubMed ID: 32090528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of an artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction algorithm for CT on image quality and potential dose reduction: A phantom study.
Greffier J; Si-Mohamed S; Frandon J; Loisy M; de Oliveira F; Beregi JP; Dabli D
Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5052-5063. PubMed ID: 35696272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subjective and objective image quality of low-dose CT images processed using a self-supervised denoising algorithm.
Kimura Y; Suyama TQ; Shimamura Y; Suzuki J; Watanabe M; Igei H; Otera Y; Kaneko T; Suzukawa M; Matsui H; Kudo H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2024 Jun; 17(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 38413510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of noise reduction on radiation dose reduction potential of virtual monochromatic spectral images: Comparison of phantom images with conventional 120 kVp images using deep learning image reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
Masuda S; Yamada Y; Minamishima K; Owaki Y; Yamazaki A; Jinzaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Apr; 149():110198. PubMed ID: 35168172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF DEEP LEARNING IN LOW-DOSE CT IMAGE DENOISING.
Zhang F; Liu J; Liu Y; Zhang X
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 Mar; 199(4):337-346. PubMed ID: 36588464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deep learning-based denoising algorithm in comparison to iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection: a 12-reader phantom study.
Kim Y; Oh DY; Chang W; Kang E; Ye JC; Lee K; Kim HY; Kim YH; Park JH; Lee YJ; Lee KH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8755-8764. PubMed ID: 33885958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose reduction and image enhancement in micro-CT using deep learning.
Muller FM; Maebe J; Vanhove C; Vandenberghe S
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5643-5656. PubMed ID: 36994779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deep Learning Denoising of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Chest Images: A Quantitative and Qualitative Image Analysis.
Azour L; Hu Y; Ko JP; Chen B; Knoll F; Alpert JB; Brusca-Augello G; Mason DM; Wickstrom ML; Kwon YJF; Babb J; Liang Z; Moore WH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 47(2):212-219. PubMed ID: 36790870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative assessment of noise properties for two deep learning CT image reconstruction techniques and filtered back projection.
Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Takata T; Seto I
Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6359-6367. PubMed ID: 36047991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image denoising by transfer learning of generative adversarial network for dental CT.
Hegazy MAA; Cho MH; Lee SY
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Sep; 6(5):055024. PubMed ID: 33444255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A performance comparison of convolutional neural network-based image denoising methods: The effect of loss functions on low-dose CT images.
Kim B; Han M; Shim H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3906-3923. PubMed ID: 31306488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two deep learning image reconstruction algorithms in chest CT images: A task-based image quality assessment on phantom data.
Greffier J; Frandon J; Si-Mohamed S; Dabli D; Hamard A; Belaouni A; Akessoul P; Besse F; Guiu B; Beregi JP
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2022 Jan; 103(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 34493475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT.
Manduca A; Yu L; Trzasko JD; Khaylova N; Kofler JM; McCollough CM; Fletcher JG
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4911-9. PubMed ID: 19994500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
