These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36371184)
1. Machine learning techniques on homological persistence features for prostate cancer diagnosis. Rammal A; Assaf R; Goupil A; Kacim M; Vrabie V BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):476. PubMed ID: 36371184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Persistent Homology for the Quantitative Evaluation of Architectural Features in Prostate Cancer Histology. Lawson P; Sholl AB; Brown JQ; Fasy BT; Wenk C Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1139. PubMed ID: 30718811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides by statistical representations of homology profile. Yan C; Nakane K; Wang X; Fu Y; Lu H; Fan X; Feldman MD; Madabhushi A; Xu J Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 194():105528. PubMed ID: 32470903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study. Kott O; Linsley D; Amin A; Karagounis A; Jeffers C; Golijanin D; Serre T; Gershman B Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 31767543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic Gleason grading of prostate cancer using quantitative phase imaging and machine learning. Nguyen TH; Sridharan S; Macias V; Kajdacsy-Balla A; Melamed J; Do MN; Popescu G J Biomed Opt; 2017 Mar; 22(3):36015. PubMed ID: 28358941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiomics Features Measured with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness. Hectors SJ; Cherny M; Yadav KK; Beksaç AT; Thulasidass H; Lewis S; Davicioni E; Wang P; Tewari AK; Taouli B J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 30958743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. WeGleNet: A weakly-supervised convolutional neural network for the semantic segmentation of Gleason grades in prostate histology images. Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Naranjo V Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2021 Mar; 88():101846. PubMed ID: 33485056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection. Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized Classification of Prostate Cancer Gleason Scores from Whole Slide Images. Xu H; Park S; Hwang TH IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2020; 17(6):1871-1882. PubMed ID: 31536012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic comparison of deep learning methods for Gleason grading and scoring. Dominguez-Morales JP; Duran-Lopez L; Marini N; Vicente-Diaz S; Linares-Barranco A; Atzori M; Müller H Med Image Anal; 2024 Jul; 95():103191. PubMed ID: 38728903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Multi-scale U-Net for Semantic Segmentation of Histological Images from Radical Prostatectomies. Li J; Sarma KV; Chung Ho K; Gertych A; Knudsen BS; Arnold CW AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():1140-1148. PubMed ID: 29854182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation. Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated multiparametric localization of prostate cancer based on B-mode, shear-wave elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound radiomics. Wildeboer RR; Mannaerts CK; van Sloun RJG; Budäus L; Tilki D; Wijkstra H; Salomon G; Mischi M Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):806-815. PubMed ID: 31602512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discriminatory Gleason grade group signatures of prostate cancer: An application of machine learning methods. Mokoatle M; Mapiye D; Marivate V; Hayes VM; Bornman R PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0267714. PubMed ID: 35679280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM). Wang Z; Millet L; Mir M; Ding H; Unarunotai S; Rogers J; Gillette MU; Popescu G Opt Express; 2011 Jan; 19(2):1016-26. PubMed ID: 21263640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using multi-label ensemble CNN classifiers to mitigate labelling inconsistencies in patch-level Gleason grading. Butt MA; Kaleem MF; Bilal M; Hanif MS PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0304847. PubMed ID: 38968206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies. Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images. Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]