112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36371503)
1. The ImSURE phantoms: a digital dataset for radiomic software benchmarking and investigation.
Bettinelli A; Marturano F; Sarnelli A; Bertoldo A; Paiusco M
Sci Data; 2022 Nov; 9(1):695. PubMed ID: 36371503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Novel Benchmarking Approach to Assess the Agreement among Radiomic Tools.
Bettinelli A; Marturano F; Avanzo M; Loi E; Menghi E; Mezzenga E; Pirrone G; Sarnelli A; Strigari L; Strolin S; Paiusco M
Radiology; 2022 Jun; 303(3):533-541. PubMed ID: 35230182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical Note: ROdiomiX: A validated software for radiomics analysis of medical images in radiation oncology.
Bagher-Ebadian H; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):354-365. PubMed ID: 33169367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benchmarking Various Radiomic Toolkit Features While Applying the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative toward Clinical Translation of Radiomic Analysis.
Lei M; Varghese B; Hwang D; Cen S; Lei X; Desai B; Azadikhah A; Oberai A; Duddalwar V
J Digit Imaging; 2021 Oct; 34(5):1156-1170. PubMed ID: 34545475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and prognostic value of radiomic features are highly dependent on choice of feature extraction platform.
Fornacon-Wood I; Mistry H; Ackermann CJ; Blackhall F; McPartlin A; Faivre-Finn C; Price GJ; O'Connor JPB
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6241-6250. PubMed ID: 32483644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical Note: An IBEX adaption toward image biomarker standardization.
Bettinelli A; Branchini M; De Monte F; Scaggion A; Paiusco M
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1167-1173. PubMed ID: 31830303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiomics software comparison using digital phantom and patient data: IBSI-compliance does not guarantee concordance of feature values.
Paquier Z; Chao SL; Acquisto A; Fenton C; Guiot T; Dhont J; Levillain H; Gulyban A; Bali MA; Reynaert N
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Sep; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 36049399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current state of radiomic research in pancreatic cancer: focusing on study design and reproducibility of findings.
Malcolm JA; Tacey M; Gibbs P; Lee B; Ko HS
Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):6659-6669. PubMed ID: 37079029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. RaCaT: An open source and easy to use radiomics calculator tool.
Pfaehler E; Zwanenburg A; de Jong JR; Boellaard R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212223. PubMed ID: 30785937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing radiomic feature robustness to interpolation in
Whybra P; Parkinson C; Foley K; Staffurth J; Spezi E
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):9649. PubMed ID: 31273242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability and reproducibility of computed tomography radiomic features extracted from peritumoral regions of lung cancer lesions.
Tunali I; Hall LO; Napel S; Cherezov D; Guvenis A; Gillies RJ; Schabath MB
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5075-5085. PubMed ID: 31494946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality control of radiomic features using 3D-printed CT phantoms.
Mahmood U; Apte A; Kanan C; Bates DDB; Corrias G; Manneli L; Oh JH; Erdi YE; Nguyen J; O'Deasy J; Shukla-Dave A
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2021 May; 8(3):033505. PubMed ID: 34222557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital phantoms for characterizing inconsistencies among radiomics extraction toolboxes.
Chang Y; Lafata K; Wang C; Duan X; Geng R; Yang Z; Yin FF
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Mar; 6(2):025016. PubMed ID: 33438642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical Note: Ontology-guided radiomics analysis workflow (O-RAW).
Shi Z; Traverso A; van Soest J; Dekker A; Wee L
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5677-5684. PubMed ID: 31580484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Radiomic Features: A Systematic Review.
Traverso A; Wee L; Dekker A; Gillies R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Nov; 102(4):1143-1158. PubMed ID: 30170872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrinsic dependencies of CT radiomic features on voxel size and number of gray levels.
Shafiq-Ul-Hassan M; Zhang GG; Latifi K; Ullah G; Hunt DC; Balagurunathan Y; Abdalah MA; Schabath MB; Goldgof DG; Mackin D; Court LE; Gillies RJ; Moros EG
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 28112418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of gray level discretization on radiomic feature stability for different CT scanners, tube currents and slice thicknesses: a comprehensive phantom study.
Larue RTHM; van Timmeren JE; de Jong EEC; Feliciani G; Leijenaar RTH; Schreurs WMJ; Sosef MN; Raat FHPJ; van der Zande FHR; Das M; van Elmpt W; Lambin P
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1544-1553. PubMed ID: 28885084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The complexity of tumor shape, spiculatedness, correlates with tumor radiomic shape features.
Limkin EJ; Reuzé S; Carré A; Sun R; Schernberg A; Alexis A; Deutsch E; Ferté C; Robert C
Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4329. PubMed ID: 30867443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stanford DRO Toolkit: Digital Reference Objects for Standardization of Radiomic Features.
Jaggi A; Mattonen SA; McNitt-Gray M; Napel S
Tomography; 2020 Jun; 6(2):111-117. PubMed ID: 32548287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
