164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36371606)
1. Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI.
Thimansson E; Bengtsson J; Baubeta E; Engman J; Flondell-Sité D; Bjartell A; Zackrisson S
Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2519-2528. PubMed ID: 36371606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of PI-RADS Versions 2.0 and 2.1 for MRI-based Calculation of the Prostate Volume.
Ghafoor S; Becker AS; Woo S; Causa Andrieu PI; Stocker D; Gangai N; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Acad Radiol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1548-1556. PubMed ID: 32814644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate volume prediction on MRI: tools, accuracy and variability.
Hamzaoui D; Montagne S; Granger B; Allera A; Ezziane M; Luzurier A; Quint R; Kalai M; Ayache N; Delingette H; Renard-Penna R
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jul; 32(7):4931-4941. PubMed ID: 35169895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods.
Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR
Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Comparison of Imaging and Clinical Methods to Estimate Prostate Volume: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.
Massanova M; Robertson S; Barone B; Dutto L; Caputo VF; Bhatt JR; Ahmad I; Bada M; Obeidallah A; Crocetto F
Urol Int; 2021; 105(9-10):804-810. PubMed ID: 34247169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimated Prostate Volume by Semiautomatic Segmentation of MRI Is More Accurately Correlated with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Weight than the Volume Calculated by Ellipsoid Formula.
Wu S; Feldman AS; Lin SX; Kim MM; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Wu CL; Dahl DM
Urol Int; 2024; 108(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 37995664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection and PI-RADS classification of focal lesions in prostate MRI: Performance comparison between a deep learning-based algorithm (DLA) and radiologists with various levels of experience.
Youn SY; Choi MH; Kim DH; Lee YJ; Huisman H; Johnson E; Penzkofer T; Shabunin I; Winkel DJ; Xing P; Szolar D; Grimm R; von Busch H; Son Y; Lou B; Kamen A
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109894. PubMed ID: 34388625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transabdominal ultrasound and MRI with the radical prostatectomy specimen volume: a retrospective observational study.
Guo S; Zhang J; Jiao J; Li Z; Wu P; Jing Y; Qin W; Wang F; Ma S
BMC Urol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):62. PubMed ID: 37069539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A standardized method to measure the membranous urethral length (MUL) on MRI of the prostate with high inter- and intra-observer agreement.
Veerman H; Hagens MJ; Hoeks CM; van der Poel HG; van Leeuwen PJ; Vis AN; Heijmink SWTJP; Schoots IG; de Haan MC; Boellaard TN
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3295-3302. PubMed ID: 36512044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A concurrent, deep learning-based computer-aided detection system for prostate multiparametric MRI: a performance study involving experienced and less-experienced radiologists.
Labus S; Altmann MM; Huisman H; Tong A; Penzkofer T; Choi MH; Shabunin I; Winkel DJ; Xing P; Szolar DH; Shea SM; Grimm R; von Busch H; Kamen A; Herold T; Baumann C
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):64-76. PubMed ID: 35900376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated computer-derived prostate volumes from MR imaging data: comparison with radiologist-derived MR imaging and pathologic specimen volumes.
Bulman JC; Toth R; Patel AD; Bloch BN; McMahon CJ; Ngo L; Madabhushi A; Rofsky NM
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 22190657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance and inter-observer variability of prostate MRI (PI-RADS version 2) outside high-volume centres.
Kohestani K; Wallström J; Dehlfors N; Sponga OM; Månsson M; Josefsson A; Carlsson S; Hellström M; Hugosson J
Scand J Urol; 2019 Oct; 53(5):304-311. PubMed ID: 31661357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Interreader variability in prostate MRI reporting using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1.
Brembilla G; Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Damascelli A; Brunetti L; Ravelli S; Cristel G; Schiani E; Venturini E; Grippaldi D; Mendola V; Rancoita PMV; Esposito A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Del Maschio A; De Cobelli F
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3383-3392. PubMed ID: 32052171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep learning-assisted prostate cancer detection on bi-parametric MRI: minimum training data size requirements and effect of prior knowledge.
Hosseinzadeh M; Saha A; Brand P; Slootweg I; de Rooij M; Huisman H
Eur Radiol; 2022 Apr; 32(4):2224-2234. PubMed ID: 34786615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of prostate volume measured by endorectal coil MRI to prostate specimen volume and mass after radical prostatectomy.
Mazaheri Y; Goldman DA; Di Paolo PL; Akin O; Hricak H
Acad Radiol; 2015 May; 22(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 25708867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of semi-automated and manual methods to measure the volume of prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging.
Marin L; Ezziane M; Comperat E; Mozer P; Cancel-Tassin G; Coté JF; Racoceanu D; Boudghene F; Lucidarme O; Cussenot O; Renard Penna R
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 May; 98(5):423-428. PubMed ID: 28330587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Prostate MRI Lesion Segmentation Agreement Between Multiple Radiologists and a Fully Automatic Deep Learning System.
Schelb P; Tavakoli AA; Tubtawee T; Hielscher T; Radtke JP; Görtz M; Schütz V; Kuder TA; Schimmöller L; Stenzinger A; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
Rofo; 2021 May; 193(5):559-573. PubMed ID: 33212541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and MR volumetry as independent associative factors for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in prostatic carcinoma.
Lim C; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Shabana WM; Quon JS; El-Khodary M; Thornhill RE; El Hallani S; Schieda N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):726-36. PubMed ID: 26303719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate Volume Estimation on MRI: Accuracy and Effects of Ellipsoid and Bullet-Shaped Measurements on PSA Density.
Stanzione A; Ponsiglione A; Di Fiore GA; Picchi SG; Di Stasi M; Verde F; Petretta M; Imbriaco M; Cuocolo R
Acad Radiol; 2021 Aug; 28(8):e219-e226. PubMed ID: 32553281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
