125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36371904)
1. The cost-effectiveness of opt-in and send-to-all HPV self-sampling among long-term non-attenders to cervical cancer screening in Norway: The Equalscreen randomized controlled trial.
Knauss T; Hansen BT; Pedersen K; Aasbø G; Kunst N; Burger EA
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 168():39-47. PubMed ID: 36371904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. HPV self-sampling among long-term non-attenders to cervical cancer screening in Norway: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
Aasbø G; Tropè A; Nygård M; Christiansen IK; Baasland I; Iversen GA; Munk AC; Christiansen MH; Presthus GK; Undem K; Bjørge T; Castle PE; Hansen BT
Br J Cancer; 2022 Nov; 127(10):1816-1826. PubMed ID: 35995936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial.
Tranberg M; Bech BH; Blaakær J; Jensen JS; Svanholm H; Andersen B
BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):273. PubMed ID: 29523108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Study protocol of the CHOiCE trial: a three-armed, randomized, controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for non-participants in an organized cervical cancer screening program.
Tranberg M; Bech BH; Blaakær J; Jensen JS; Svanholm H; Andersen B
BMC Cancer; 2016 Nov; 16(1):835. PubMed ID: 27809810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of sending a direct send HPV self-sampling kit to long-term non-attenders in an organized cervical screening program.
Sahlgren H; Sparén P; Elfgren K; Miriam Elfström K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Jan; 268():68-73. PubMed ID: 34875556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic Evaluation of Mailed Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kits for Cervical Cancer Screening.
Meenan RT; Troja C; Buist DSM; Tiro JA; Lin J; Anderson ML; Gao H; Green BB; Winer RL
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e234052. PubMed ID: 36947040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses.
Arbyn M; Smith SB; Temin S; Sultana F; Castle P;
BMJ; 2018 Dec; 363():k4823. PubMed ID: 30518635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mailing human papillomavirus self-sampling kits to women under-screened for cervical cancer improved detection in cervical cancer screening in a general population study in Japan.
Nishimura Y; Matsuura M; Terada N; Nagao S; Shimada H; Isoyama K; Tamate M; Iwasaki M; Saito T
BMC Public Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):473. PubMed ID: 36906527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two self-sampling strategies for HPV primary cervical cancer screening compared with clinician-collected sampling: an economic evaluation.
Huntington S; Puri Sudhir K; Schneider V; Sargent A; Turner K; Crosbie EJ; Adams EJ
BMJ Open; 2023 Jun; 13(6):e068940. PubMed ID: 37280031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The costs of offering HPV-testing on self-taken samples to non-attendees of cervical screening in Finland.
Virtanen A; Anttila A; Nieminen P
BMC Womens Health; 2015 Nov; 15():99. PubMed ID: 26542953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acceptance of Self-Sampling Among Long-Term Cervical Screening Non-Attenders with HPV-Positive Results: Promising Opportunity for Specific Cancer Education.
Andersson S; Belkić K; Mints M; Östensson E
J Cancer Educ; 2021 Feb; 36(1):126-133. PubMed ID: 31522376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Home-Mailed Versus General Practitioner-Delivered Vaginal Self-Sampling Kit for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial with a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Boyard J; Caille A; Brunet-Houdard S; Sengchanh-Vidal S; Giraudeau B; Marret H; Rolland-Lozachmeur G; Rusch E; Gaudy-Graffin C; Haguenoer K
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2022 Oct; 31(10):1472-1480. PubMed ID: 35834620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomised trial of HPV self-sampling among non-attenders in the Slovenian cervical screening programme ZORA: comparing three different screening approaches.
Ivanus U; Jerman T; Fokter AR; Takac I; Prevodnik VK; Marcec M; Gajsek US; Pakiz M; Koren J; Celik SH; Kramberger KG; Klopcic U; Kavalar R; Zatler SS; Kuzmanov BG; Florjancic M; Nolde N; Novakovic S; Poljak M; Zakelj MP
Radiol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 52(4):399-412. PubMed ID: 30216191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Operational experiences from the general implementation of HPV self-sampling to Danish screening non-attenders.
Ejegod DM; Pedersen H; Pedersen BT; Serizawa R; Bonde J
Prev Med; 2022 Jul; 160():107096. PubMed ID: 35594924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human papillomavirus self-sampling for long-term non-attenders in cervical cancer screening: A randomised feasibility study in Estonia.
Veerus P; Hallik R; Jänes J; Jõers K; Paapsi K; Laidra K; Innos K
J Med Screen; 2022 Mar; 29(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 34694179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability.
Racey CS; Gesink DC; Burchell AN; Trivers S; Wong T; Rebbapragada A
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 May; 25(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 26598955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. HPV self-sampling and follow-up over two rounds of cervical screening in Australia - the iPap trial.
Sultana F; Gertig DM; English DR; Simpson JA; Drennan KT; Wrede CD; Mullins RM; Heley S; Saville M; Brotherton JM
J Med Screen; 2022 Sep; 29(3):185-193. PubMed ID: 35313763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of vaginal self-sampling and cervical sampling by medical professionals for the detection of HPV and CIN2+: A randomized study.
Aarnio R; Isacson I; Sanner K; Gustavsson I; Gyllensten U; Olovsson M
Int J Cancer; 2021 Jun; 148(12):3051-3059. PubMed ID: 33497465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two invitation-based methods for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling with usual care among un- and under-screened Māori, Pacific and Asian women: study protocol for a randomised controlled community trial to examine the effect of self-sampling on participation in cervical-cancer screening.
Brewer N; Bartholomew K; Maxwell A; Grant J; McPherson G; Wihongi H; Bromhead C; Scott N; Crengle S; Cunningham C; Douwes J; Potter JD
BMC Cancer; 2019 Dec; 19(1):1198. PubMed ID: 31815615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
