138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36372011)
1. A comparison of likelihood ratios with and without assuming relatedness for DNA mixtures interpreted using a continuous model.
Kruijver M; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jan; 62():102800. PubMed ID: 36372011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relaxing the assumption of unrelatedness in the numerator and denominator of likelihood ratios for DNA mixtures.
Allen PS; Pugh SN; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Curran JM; Kerr Z; Buckleton JS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Mar; 51():102434. PubMed ID: 33348219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation into the effect of mixtures comprising related people on non-donor likelihood ratios, and potential practises to mitigate providing misleading opinions.
Kalafut T; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102691. PubMed ID: 35390645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating DNA Mixtures with Contributors from Different Populations Using Probabilistic Genotyping.
Kruijver M; Kelly H; Bright JA; Buckleton J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 36672780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring likelihood ratios assigned for siblings of the true mixture contributor as an alternate contributor.
Kelly H; Coble M; Kruijver M; Wivell R; Bright JA
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1167-1175. PubMed ID: 35211970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The analogy between DNA kinship and DNA mixture evaluation, with applications for the interpretation of likelihood ratios produced by possibly imperfect models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102449. PubMed ID: 33517022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Probabilistic genotyping of single cell replicates from complex DNA mixtures recovers higher contributor LRs than standard analysis.
Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 35277229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.
Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing multiple POI to DNA mixtures.
Hicks T; Kerr Z; Pugh S; Bright JA; Curran J; Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102481. PubMed ID: 33607394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.
Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved individual identification in DNA mixtures of unrelated or related contributors through massively parallel sequencing.
Liu Z; Wu E; Li R; Liu J; Zang Y; Cong B; Wu R; Xie B; Sun H
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jun; 72():103078. PubMed ID: 38889491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of large-scale highly polymorphic microhaplotypes in complex DNA mixtures analysis using RMNE method.
Zhu Q; Wang H; Cao Y; Huang Y; Wei Y; Hu Y; Dai X; Shan T; Wang Y; Zhang J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102874. PubMed ID: 37075688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Investigation into Compound Likelihood Ratios for Forensic DNA Mixtures.
Wivell R; Kelly H; Kokoszka J; Daniels J; Dickson L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An inter-laboratory comparison of probabilistic genotyping parameters and evaluation of performance on DNA mixtures from different laboratories.
Boodoosingh S; Kelly H; Curran JM; Kalafut T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103046. PubMed ID: 38598920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mixture interpretation: Experimental and simulated reevaluation of qualitative analysis.
Manabe S; Mori Y; Kawai C; Ozeki M; Tamaki K
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Mar; 15(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 23089142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
