BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3637221)

  • 1. Staff nurse performance. Effects of goal-setting and performance feedback.
    Stull MK
    J Nurs Adm; 1986; 16(7-8):26-30. PubMed ID: 3637221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Being objective about appraisal.
    McKenzie I
    Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance feedback: a question of source credibility.
    Stull MK
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):17, 39. PubMed ID: 3633964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement technology applications in performance appraisal.
    Stalker MZ; Kornblith AB; Lewis PM; Parker R
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):12-7. PubMed ID: 3633963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Assessment of the work efficiency of nurses].
    Vedenko BG; Sushchik LP; Vedenko LB
    Med Sestra; 1985 Sep; 44(9):24-6. PubMed ID: 3853062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
    Goodykoontz L
    Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Establishing a criterion-based performance appraisal for a department of nursing.
    Megel MA
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1983 Sep; 18(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 6554709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nurse performance: strengths and weaknesses.
    McCloskey JC; McCain B
    Nurs Res; 1988; 37(5):308-13. PubMed ID: 3419947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Communication: key contributor to effectiveness--the research.
    Pincus JD
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Sep; 16(9):19-25. PubMed ID: 3638336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6.
    Martin V
    Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance appraisal tests for staff nurses.
    Cunningham CV
    Nurs Times; 1981 May; 77(22):suppl 16: 61-3. PubMed ID: 6909815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Setting standards and evaluating nursing performance with a single tool.
    Fosbinder D; Vos H
    J Nurs Adm; 1989 Oct; 19(10):23-30. PubMed ID: 2778515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The head nurse and the difficulties of personnel evaluation].
    Lanctôt L
    Infirm Can; 1979 Jun; 21(6):18-20. PubMed ID: 255446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance appraisal for community health nurses through self-appraisal and goal setting.
    Knox LJ; MacKay RC
    Nurs Pap; 1982; 14(3):17-31. PubMed ID: 6925788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assuring quality through staff nurse performance.
    Porter AL
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1988 Sep; 23(3):649-55. PubMed ID: 3419995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating supplemental professional nurses.
    Metzger NJ
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):54-5, 58-9, 62. PubMed ID: 2294495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward a comprehensive personnel system: staff development Part III.
    Nauright LP
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Jul; 18(7):44-6, 48. PubMed ID: 3648598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making performance appraisal work.
    Noble JE
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subordinate performance appraisal: what nurses really want in their managers.
    Tayler CM
    Can J Nurs Adm; 1992; 5(3):6-9. PubMed ID: 1463762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward a comprehensive personnel system: performance appraisal--Part IV.
    Nauright L
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Aug; 18(8):67-70, 75-7. PubMed ID: 3649657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.