These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36373355)

  • 1. A commentary on the quality improvement practices in leading an organizational response to audit feedback.
    Sykes M
    JBI Evid Implement; 2022 Sep; 20(3):166-171. PubMed ID: 36373355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancing national audit through addressing the quality improvement capabilities of feedback recipients: a multi-phase intervention development study.
    Sykes M; O'Halloran E; Mahon L; McSharry J; Allan L; Thomson R; Finch T; Kolehmainen N
    Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2022 Jul; 8(1):143. PubMed ID: 35804468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia.
    Sykes M; Thomson R; Kolehmainen N; Allan L; Finch T
    Implement Sci; 2020 Jun; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 32552860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How is feedback from national clinical audits used? Views from English National Health Service trust audit leads.
    Taylor A; Neuburger J; Walker K; Cromwell D; Groene O
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2016 Apr; 21(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 26811374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How do healthcare providers use national audit data for improvement?
    Antonacci G; Whitney J; Harris M; Reed JE
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Apr; 23(1):393. PubMed ID: 37095495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Opportunities to enhance ward audit: a multi-site qualitative study.
    Sykes M; Thomson R; Kolehmainen N; Allan L; Finch T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Mar; 21(1):226. PubMed ID: 33712006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acting on audit & feedback: a qualitative instrumental case study in mental health services in Norway.
    Pedersen MS; Landheim A; Møller M; Lien L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jan; 18(1):71. PubMed ID: 29386020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring variation in the use of feedback from national clinical audits: a realist investigation.
    Alvarado N; McVey L; Greenhalgh J; Dowding D; Mamas M; Gale C; Doherty P; Randell R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Sep; 20(1):859. PubMed ID: 32917202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-supported feedback message tailoring: theory-informed adaptation of clinical audit and feedback for learning and behavior change.
    Landis-Lewis Z; Brehaut JC; Hochheiser H; Douglas GP; Jacobson RS
    Implement Sci; 2015 Jan; 10():12. PubMed ID: 25603806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of a team Quality Improvement method in a national clinical audit programme of four clinical specialties in Ministry of Health hospitals in Saudi Arabia.
    Alghamdi S; Dixon N; Al-Senani F; Al Aseri Z; Al Saif S; AlTahan T
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2024 Feb; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 38153764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Keys to successful clinical audit and feedback: essential steps to making impactful improvements in patient care.
    Delaforce A; Moore D
    JBI Evid Implement; 2024 Aug; 22(3):330-333. PubMed ID: 39036874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care.
    Gude WT; Roos-Blom MJ; van der Veer SN; Dongelmans DA; de Jonge E; Peek N; de Keizer NF
    Implement Sci; 2019 Sep; 14(1):90. PubMed ID: 31533841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical audits to improve critical care: Part 2: Analyse, benchmark and feedback.
    Ray-Barruel G; Ullman AJ; Rickard CM; Cooke M
    Aust Crit Care; 2018 Mar; 31(2):106-109. PubMed ID: 28587719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic review.
    Foy R; Eccles MP; Jamtvedt G; Young J; Grimshaw JM; Baker R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2005 Jul; 5():50. PubMed ID: 16011811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Embedding clinical audit into everyday practice: Essential methodology for all clinicians.
    Skull S
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2020 Oct; 56(10):1533-1536. PubMed ID: 32932550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditions and barriers for quality improvement work: a qualitative study of how professionals and health centre managers experience audit and feedback practices in Swedish primary care.
    Arvidsson E; Dahlin S; Anell A
    BMC Fam Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(1):113. PubMed ID: 34126935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mental models of audit and feedback in primary care settings.
    Hysong SJ; Smitham K; SoRelle R; Amspoker A; Hughes AM; Haidet P
    Implement Sci; 2018 May; 13(1):73. PubMed ID: 29848372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.