These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36374384)

  • 1. A hybrid Bayesian BWM and Pythagorean fuzzy WASPAS-based decision-making framework for parcel locker location selection problem.
    Yalcin Kavus B; Ayyildiz E; Gulum Tas P; Taskin A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(39):90006-90023. PubMed ID: 36374384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Micro-hub location selection for sustainable last-mile delivery.
    Novotná M; Švadlenka L; Jovčić S; Simić V
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270926. PubMed ID: 35789231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul.
    Karagoz S; Deveci M; Simic V; Aydin N; Bolukbas U
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jun; 38(6):660-672. PubMed ID: 31969081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. COVID-19 safe campus evaluation for universities by a hybrid interval type-2 fuzzy decision-making model.
    Baskak D; Ozbey S; Yucesan M; Gul M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(3):8133-8153. PubMed ID: 36056282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Land Efficient Mobility: Evaluation of Autonomous Last Mile Delivery Concepts in London.
    Schnieder M; Hinde C; West A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(16):. PubMed ID: 36011922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining locations and layouts for parcel lockers to support supply chain viability at the last mile.
    Kahr M
    Omega; 2022 Dec; 113():102721. PubMed ID: 35875464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induced interval-valued Pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy aggregation operators based on Einstein operations and their application in group decision making.
    Shakeel M; Abdullah S; Shahzad M; Fahmi A
    J Integr Neurosci; 2018; 17(3-4):633-659. PubMed ID: 30149460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novel dynamic fuzzy Decision-Making framework for COVID-19 vaccine dose recipients.
    Albahri OS; Zaidan AA; Albahri AS; Alsattar HA; Mohammed R; Aickelin U; Kou G; Jumaah FM; Salih MM; Alamoodi AH; Zaidan BB; Alazab M; Alnoor A; Al-Obaidi JR
    J Adv Res; 2022 Mar; 37():147-168. PubMed ID: 35475277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Group Decision-Making Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Entropy and the Complex Proportional Assessment.
    Thakur P; Kizielewicz B; Gandotra N; Shekhovtsov A; Saini N; Sałabun W
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity Analysis of Emission Models of Parcel Lockers vs. Home Delivery Based on HBEFA.
    Schnieder M; Hinde C; West A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(12):. PubMed ID: 34207992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Green Recycling Supplier Selection of Shared Bicycles: Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Hybrid Weighted Methods Based on Self-Confidence Level.
    Pan Y; Li Y; Zeng S; Hu J; Ullah K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Apr; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 35564420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 2-tuple linguistic Fermatean fuzzy MAGDM based on the WASPAS method for selection of solid waste disposal location.
    Akram M; Ali U; Santos-García G; Niaz Z
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Jan; 20(2):3811-3837. PubMed ID: 36899606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-criteria healthcare waste disposal location selection based on Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS method.
    Mishra AR; Rani P
    Complex Intell Systems; 2021; 7(5):2469-2484. PubMed ID: 34777968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
    Afrasiabi A; Tavana M; Di Caprio D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37291-37314. PubMed ID: 35050472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE multi-criteria group decision-making and most suitable biomedical material selection.
    Kirişci M; Demir I; Şimşek N
    Artif Intell Med; 2022 May; 127():102278. PubMed ID: 35430046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Offshore wind power station (OWPS) site selection using a two-stage MCDM-based spherical fuzzy set approach.
    Wang CN; Nguyen NA; Dang TT
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4260. PubMed ID: 35277582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on the set pair analysis theory and Choquet integral.
    Li F; Xie J; Lin M
    Complex Intell Systems; 2023; 9(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 35729964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Additive manufacturing process selection for automotive industry using Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC EDAS.
    Menekse A; Ertemel AV; Camgoz Akdag H; Gorener A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282676. PubMed ID: 36893100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of improved fuzzy best worst analytic hierarchy process on renewable energy.
    Majumder P; Balas VE; Paul A; Baidya D
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e453. PubMed ID: 33954237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.