184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36375440)
1. Action spectra and mechanisms of (in) efficiency of bipolar electric pulses at electroporation.
Kim V; Semenov I; Kiester AS; Keppler MA; Ibey BL; Bixler JN; Pakhomov AG
Bioelectrochemistry; 2023 Feb; 149():108319. PubMed ID: 36375440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The second phase of bipolar, nanosecond-range electric pulses determines the electroporation efficiency.
Pakhomov AG; Grigoryev S; Semenov I; Casciola M; Jiang C; Xiao S
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Aug; 122():123-133. PubMed ID: 29627664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interference targeting of bipolar nanosecond electric pulses for spatially focused electroporation, electrostimulation, and tissue ablation.
Pakhomov AG; Gudvangen E; Xiao S; Semenov I
Bioelectrochemistry; 2021 Oct; 141():107876. PubMed ID: 34171507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Next generation CANCAN focusing for remote stimulation by nanosecond electric pulses.
Pakhomov AG; Gudvangen E; Mangalanathan U; Kondratiev O; Redondo L; Semenov I
Bioelectrochemistry; 2023 Aug; 152():108437. PubMed ID: 37030093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electropermeabilization by uni- or bipolar nanosecond electric pulses: The impact of extracellular conductivity.
Gianulis EC; Casciola M; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON; Pakhomov AG
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Feb; 119():10-19. PubMed ID: 28865240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selective distant electrostimulation by synchronized bipolar nanosecond pulses.
Gianulis EC; Casciola M; Zhou C; Yang E; Xiao S; Pakhomov AG
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13116. PubMed ID: 31511591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Control of the Electroporation Efficiency of Nanosecond Pulses by Swinging the Electric Field Vector Direction.
Kim V; Semenov I; Kiester AS; Keppler MA; Ibey BL; Bixler JN; Colunga Biancatelli RML; Pakhomov AG
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Jun; 24(13):. PubMed ID: 37446096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sub-MHz bursts of nanosecond pulses excite neurons at paradoxically low electric field thresholds without membrane damage.
Silkunas M; Gudvangen E; Novickij V; Pakhomov AG
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr; 2022 Nov; 1864(11):184034. PubMed ID: 35981654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cancellation of cellular responses to nanoelectroporation by reversing the stimulus polarity.
Pakhomov AG; Semenov I; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON; Gregory B; Schoenbach KH; Ullery JC; Beier HT; Rajulapati SR; Ibey BL
Cell Mol Life Sci; 2014 Nov; 71(22):4431-41. PubMed ID: 24748074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.
Pakhomov AG; Gianulis E; Vernier PT; Semenov I; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 Apr; 1848(4):958-66. PubMed ID: 25585279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of Proteins Involved in Cell Membrane Permeabilization by Nanosecond Electric Pulses (nsEP).
Silkuniene G; Mangalanathan UM; Rossi A; Mollica PA; Pakhomov AG; Pakhomova O
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 May; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 37298142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gadolinium modifies the cell membrane to inhibit permeabilization by nanosecond electric pulses.
Gianulis EC; Pakhomov AG
Arch Biochem Biophys; 2015 Mar; 570():1-7. PubMed ID: 25707556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electropermeabilization of cells by closely spaced paired nanosecond-range pulses.
Semenov I; Casciola M; Ibey BL; Xiao S; Pakhomov AG
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Jun; 121():135-141. PubMed ID: 29413863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of asymmetrical bipolar pulses and interphase intervals on the bipolar cancellation phenomenon in the ovarian cancer cell line.
Łapińska Z; Novickij V; Rembiałkowska N; Szewczyk A; Dubińska-Magiera M; Kulbacka J; Saczko J
Bioelectrochemistry; 2023 Oct; 153():108483. PubMed ID: 37301162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electroporation of mammalian cells by nanosecond electric field oscillations and its inhibition by the electric field reversal.
Gianulis EC; Lee J; Jiang C; Xiao S; Ibey BL; Pakhomov AG
Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():13818. PubMed ID: 26348662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The interphase interval within a bipolar nanosecond electric pulse modulates bipolar cancellation.
Valdez CM; Barnes R; Roth CC; Moen E; Ibey B
Bioelectromagnetics; 2018 Sep; 39(6):441-450. PubMed ID: 29984850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stimulation or Cancellation of Ca
Bagalkot TR; Leblanc N; Craviso GL
Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11545. PubMed ID: 31395918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Excitation and electroporation by MHz bursts of nanosecond stimuli.
Pakhomov AG; Xiao S; Novickij V; Casciola M; Semenov I; Mangalanathan U; Kim V; Zemlin C; Sozer E; Muratori C; Pakhomova ON
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2019 Oct; 518(4):759-764. PubMed ID: 31472962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-voltage 10 ns delayed paired or bipolar pulses for in vitro bioelectric experiments.
Orlacchio R; Carr L; Palego C; Arnaud-Cormos D; Leveque P
Bioelectrochemistry; 2021 Feb; 137():107648. PubMed ID: 32927361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffuse, non-polar electropermeabilization and reduced propidium uptake distinguish the effect of nanosecond electric pulses.
Semenov I; Zemlin C; Pakhomova ON; Xiao S; Pakhomov AG
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 Oct; 1848(10 Pt A):2118-25. PubMed ID: 26112464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
