148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36375679)
21. UK Valuation of EQ-5D-5L, a Generic Measure of Health-Related Quality of Life: A Study Protocol.
Rowen D; Mukuria C; Bray N; Carlton J; Cooper S; Longworth L; Meads D; O'Neill C; Yang Y
Value Health; 2023 Nov; 26(11):1625-1635. PubMed ID: 37722593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Igarashi A; Fukuda T; Saito S; Shimozuma K
Value Health; 2016; 19(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 27565282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accounting for Unobservable Preference Heterogeneity and Evaluating Alternative Anchoring Approaches to Estimate Country-Specific EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: A Case Study Using Spanish Preference Data.
Ramos-Goñi JM; Oppe M; Estévez-Carrillo A; Rivero-Arias O;
Value Health; 2022 May; 25(5):835-843. PubMed ID: 35500952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dealing with the health state 'dead' when using discrete choice experiments to obtain values for EQ-5D-5L heath states.
Ramos-Goñi JM; Rivero-Arias O; Errea M; Stolk EA; Herdman M; Cabasés JM
Eur J Health Econ; 2013 Jul; 14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33-42. PubMed ID: 23900663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cross-Attribute Level Effects Models for Modeling Modified 5-Level Version of EQ-5D Health State Values: Is Less Still More?
Yang Z; Rand K; Busschbach J; Luo N
Value Health; 2023 Jun; 26(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 36566885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for Indonesia by Mapping the DCE onto TTO Values.
Fitriana TS; Roudijk B; Purba FD; Busschbach JJV; Stolk E
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Dec; 40(Suppl 2):157-167. PubMed ID: 36348155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China.
Luo N; Liu G; Li M; Guan H; Jin X; Rand-Hendriksen K
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):662-669. PubMed ID: 28408009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing the Use of a Feedback Module to Model EQ-5D-5L Health States Values in Hong Kong.
Wong ELY; Ramos-Goñi JM; Cheung AWL; Wong AYK; Rivero-Arias O
Patient; 2018 Apr; 11(2):235-247. PubMed ID: 29019161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Toward a Smaller Design for EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies.
Yang Z; Luo N; Oppe M; Bonsel G; Busschbach J; Stolk E
Value Health; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1295-1302. PubMed ID: 31708067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L in Taiwan.
Lin HW; Li CI; Lin FJ; Chang JY; Gau CS; Luo N; Pickard AS; Ramos Goñi JM; Tang CH; Hsu CN
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209344. PubMed ID: 30586400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. EQ-5D-5L: a value set for Romania.
Olariu E; Mohammed W; Oluboyede Y; Caplescu R; Niculescu-Aron IG; Paveliu MS; Vale L
Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Apr; 24(3):399-412. PubMed ID: 35688994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. German Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.
Ludwig K; Graf von der Schulenburg JM; Greiner W
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jun; 36(6):663-674. PubMed ID: 29460066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. How dead is dead? Qualitative findings from participants of combined traditional and lead-time time trade-off valuations.
Al Sayah F; Mladenovic A; Gaebel K; Xie F; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2016 Jan; 25(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26216584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimating a social value set for EQ-5D-5L in Sweden.
Sun S; Chuang LH; Sahlén KG; Lindholm L; Norström F
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Dec; 20(1):167. PubMed ID: 36564844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Test-Retest Reliability of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Techniques: The Composite Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.
Purba FD; Hunfeld JAM; Timman R; Iskandarsyah A; Fitriana TS; Sadarjoen SS; Passchier J; Busschbach JJV
Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1243-1249. PubMed ID: 30314626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Systematic Review of the Methodologies and Modelling Approaches Used to Generate International EQ-5D-5L Value Sets.
Rowen D; Mukuria C; McDool E
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Sep; 40(9):863-882. PubMed ID: 35829931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Investigating 5-Level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) Values Based on Preferences of Patients With Heart Disease.
Gandhi M; Tan RS; Lim SL; Rand K; Lam CSP; Luo N; Cheung YB
Value Health; 2022 Mar; 25(3):451-460. PubMed ID: 35227458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Valuing Health State: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Ethiopians.
Welie AG; Gebretekle GB; Stolk E; Mukuria C; Krahn MD; Enquoselassie F; Fenta TG
Value Health Reg Issues; 2020 Sep; 22():7-14. PubMed ID: 31683254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.
M Versteegh M; M Vermeulen K; M A A Evers S; de Wit GA; Prenger R; A Stolk E
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 27325326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
