These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36375987)

  • 1. Learning from stakeholders to inform good practice guidance on consent to research in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study.
    Paddock K; Woolfall K; Kearney A; Pattison N; Frith L; Gamble C; Welters I; Trinder J; Young B
    BMJ Open; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e066149. PubMed ID: 36375987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.
    Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategies to enhance recruitment and consent to intensive care studies: a qualitative study with researchers and patient-public involvement contributors.
    Paddock K; Woolfall K; Frith L; Watkins M; Gamble C; Welters I; Young B
    BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e048193. PubMed ID: 34551943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study.
    Mehta S; Quittnat Pelletier F; Brown M; Ethier C; Wells D; Burry L; MacDonald R
    Intensive Care Med; 2012 Jan; 38(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 22120767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol.
    Crawshaw J; Presseau J; van Allen Z; Pinheiro Carvalho L; Jordison K; English S; Fergusson DA; Lauzier F; Turgeon AF; Sarti AJ; Martin C; D'Aragon F; Li AH; Knoll G; Ball I; Brehaut J; Burns KEA; Fortin MC; Weiss M; Meade M; Marsolais P; Shemie S; Zaabat S; Dhanani S; Kitto SC; Chassé M;
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e034594. PubMed ID: 31874899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study.
    Parker MJ; de Laat S; Schwartz L
    BMJ Open; 2016 Sep; 6(9):e012931. PubMed ID: 27625066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Deferred Consent Model in a Prospective Observational Study Evaluating Myocardial Injury in the Intensive Care Unit.
    Honarmand K; Belley-Cote EP; Ulic D; Khalifa A; Gibson A; McClure G; Savija N; Alshamsi F; D'Aragon F; Rochwerg B; Duan EH; Karachi T; Lamontagne F; Devereaux PJ; Whitlock RP; Cook DJ
    J Intensive Care Med; 2018 Aug; 33(8):475-480. PubMed ID: 29991343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surrogate decision makers' attitudes towards research decision making for critically ill patients.
    Barrett KA; Ferguson ND; Athaide V; Cook DJ; Friedrich JO; McDonald E; Pinto R; Smith OM; Stevenson J; Scales DC
    Intensive Care Med; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1616-23. PubMed ID: 22825282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is there a role for physician involvement in introducing research to surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit? (The Approach trial: a pilot mixed methods study).
    Burns KE; Rizvi L; Smith OM; Lee Y; Lee J; Wang M; Brown M; Parker M; Premji A; Leung D; Hammond Mobilio M; Gotlib-Conn L; Nisenbaum R; Santos M; Li Y; Mehta S
    Intensive Care Med; 2015 Jan; 41(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 25491659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Varying (preferred) levels of involvement in treatment decision-making in the intensive care unit before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study among relatives.
    Renckens SC; Pasman HR; Jorna Z; Klop HT; Perron CD; van Zuylen L; Steegers MAH; Ten Tusscher BL; van Mol MMC; Vloet LCM; Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2024 Feb; 24(1):46. PubMed ID: 38347583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re-evaluating ethical concerns in planned emergency research involving critically ill patients: an interpretation of the guidance document from the United States Food and Drug Administration.
    Smischney NJ; Onigkeit JA; Hinds RF; Nicholson WT
    J Clin Ethics; 2015; 26(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 25794295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National survey on the indicators of quality in Bioethics of the SEMICYUC in the departments of Intensive Care Medicine in Spain.
    López Camps V; García García MA; Martín Delgado MC; Añón Elizalde JM; Masnou Burrallo N; Rubio Sanchiz O; Estella García A; Monzón Marín JL;
    Med Intensiva; 2017 Dec; 41(9):523-531. PubMed ID: 28389026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sense of responsibility in ICU end-of-life decision-making: Relatives' experiences.
    Lind R
    Nurs Ethics; 2019 Feb; 26(1):270-279. PubMed ID: 28587503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Research recruitment practices and critically ill patients. A multicenter, cross-sectional study (the Consent Study).
    Burns KE; Zubrinich C; Tan W; Raptis S; Xiong W; Smith O; McDonald E; Marshall JC; Saginur R; Heslegrave R; Rubenfeld G; Cook DJ;
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Jun; 187(11):1212-8. PubMed ID: 23525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Procedures of recruiting, obtaining informed consent, and compensating research participants in Qatar: findings from a qualitative investigation.
    Killawi A; Khidir A; Elnashar M; Abdelrahim H; Hammoud M; Elliott H; Thurston M; Asad H; Al-Khal AL; Fetters MD
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Feb; 15():9. PubMed ID: 24495499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Key stakeholder perceptions about consent to participate in acute illness research: a rapid, systematic review to inform epi/pandemic research preparedness.
    Gobat NH; Gal M; Francis NA; Hood K; Watkins A; Turner J; Moore R; Webb SA; Butler CC; Nichol A
    Trials; 2015 Dec; 16():591. PubMed ID: 26715077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research: findings of focus group participants.
    Iverson E; Celious A; Kennedy CR; Shehane E; Eastman A; Warren V; Bolcic-Jankovic D; Clarridge B; Freeman BD
    Chest; 2012 Dec; 142(6):1433-1439. PubMed ID: 22677349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Behavioral Nudges to Improve Enrollment in Critical Care Trials.
    Krutsinger DC; O'Leary KL; Ellenberg SS; Cotner CE; Halpern SD; Courtright KR
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2020 Sep; 17(9):1117-1125. PubMed ID: 32441987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in critically ill patients treated in intensive care units: a mixed-methods feasibility study (the SuDDICU study).
    Francis JJ; Duncan EM; Prior ME; Maclennan GS; Dombrowski S; Bellingan GU; Campbell MK; Eccles MP; Rose L; Rowan KM; Shulman R; Peter R Wilson A; Cuthbertson BH
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(25):1-170. PubMed ID: 24775071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informed consent in the intensive care unit: the experiences and expectations of patients and their families.
    Modra LJ; Hart GK; Hilton A; Moore S
    Crit Care Resusc; 2014 Dec; 16(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 25437219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.