These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36376612)

  • 21. Modeling memory dynamics in visual expertise.
    Annis J; Palmeri TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1599-1618. PubMed ID: 30346211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cortical Thickness in Fusiform Face Area Predicts Face and Object Recognition Performance.
    McGugin RW; Van Gulick AE; Gauthier I
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 28(2):282-94. PubMed ID: 26439272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Direct comparison of the neural substrates of recognition memory for words and faces.
    Kim JJ; Andreasen NC; O'Leary DS; Wiser AK; Ponto LL; Watkins GL; Hichwa RD
    Brain; 1999 Jun; 122 ( Pt 6)():1069-83. PubMed ID: 10356060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Roles of familiarity and novelty in visual preference judgments are segregated across object categories.
    Park J; Shimojo E; Shimojo S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Aug; 107(33):14552-5. PubMed ID: 20679235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perception and conception: temporal lobe activity during complex discriminations of familiar and novel faces and objects.
    Barense MD; Henson RN; Graham KS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):3052-67. PubMed ID: 21391761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Face perception is category-specific: evidence from normal body perception in acquired prosopagnosia.
    Susilo T; Yovel G; Barton JJ; Duchaine B
    Cognition; 2013 Oct; 129(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 23856076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Expertise increases the functional overlap between face and object perception.
    McKeeff TJ; McGugin RW; Tong F; Gauthier I
    Cognition; 2010 Dec; 117(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 20933227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Face-specific and domain-general visual processing deficits in children with developmental prosopagnosia.
    Dalrymple KA; Elison JT; Duchaine B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Feb; 70(2):259-275. PubMed ID: 27144387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What is special about expertise? Visual expertise reveals the interactive nature of real-world object recognition.
    Harel A
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Mar; 83():88-99. PubMed ID: 26095002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distinct familiarity-based response patterns for faces and buildings in perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex.
    Martin CB; McLean DA; O'Neil EB; Köhler S
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 33(26):10915-23. PubMed ID: 23804111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The other-race effect and holistic processing across racial groups.
    Wong HK; Estudillo AJ; Stephen ID; Keeble DRT
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8507. PubMed ID: 33875735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recognition of pareidolic objects in developmental prosopagnosic and neurotypical individuals.
    Epihova G; Cook R; Andrews TJ
    Cortex; 2022 Aug; 153():21-31. PubMed ID: 35576670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts.
    Martelli M; Majaj NJ; Pelli DG
    J Vis; 2005 Feb; 5(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 15831067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Complementary hemispheric asymmetries in object naming and recognition: a voxel-based correlational study.
    Acres K; Taylor KI; Moss HE; Stamatakis EA; Tyler LK
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1836-43. PubMed ID: 19428415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Domain-specific experience determines individual differences in holistic processing.
    Chua KW; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jan; 149(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 31144835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. N170 adaptation effect for repeated faces and words.
    Cao X; Ma X; Qi C
    Neuroscience; 2015 May; 294():21-8. PubMed ID: 25772788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing.
    Gauthier I; Curran T; Curby KM; Collins D
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 6(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 12627167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impaired face and word recognition without object agnosia.
    Buxbaum LJ; Glosser G; Coslett HB
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jan; 37(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 9920470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Agnosic vision is like peripheral vision, which is limited by crowding.
    Strappini F; Pelli DG; Di Pace E; Martelli M
    Cortex; 2017 Apr; 89():135-155. PubMed ID: 28284488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.