BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36376793)

  • 1. Combining genetic constraint with predictions of alternative splicing to prioritize deleterious splicing in rare disease studies.
    Cormier MJ; Pedersen BS; Bayrak-Toydemir P; Quinlan AR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):482. PubMed ID: 36376793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic Computational Identification of Variants That Activate Exonic and Intronic Cryptic Splice Sites.
    Lee M; Roos P; Sharma N; Atalar M; Evans TA; Pellicore MJ; Davis E; Lam AN; Stanley SE; Khalil SE; Solomon GM; Walker D; Raraigh KS; Vecchio-Pagan B; Armanios M; Cutting GR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2017 May; 100(5):751-765. PubMed ID: 28475858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance evaluation of computational methods for splice-disrupting variants and improving the performance using the machine learning-based framework.
    Liu H; Dai J; Li K; Sun Y; Wei H; Wang H; Zhao C; Wang DW
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 Sep; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 35976049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretable prioritization of splice variants in diagnostic next-generation sequencing.
    Danis D; Jacobsen JOB; Carmody LC; Gargano MA; McMurry JA; Hegde A; Haendel MA; Valentini G; Smedley D; Robinson PN
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Sep; 108(9):1564-1577. PubMed ID: 34289339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic analysis of splicing variants identifies new diagnoses in the 100,000 Genomes Project.
    Blakes AJM; Wai HA; Davies I; Moledina HE; Ruiz A; Thomas T; Bunyan D; Thomas NS; Burren CP; Greenhalgh L; Lees M; Pichini A; Smithson SF; Taylor Tavares AL; O'Donovan P; Douglas AGL; ; Whiffin N; Baralle D; Lord J
    Genome Med; 2022 Jul; 14(1):79. PubMed ID: 35883178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Introme accurately predicts the impact of coding and noncoding variants on gene splicing, with clinical applications.
    Sullivan PJ; Gayevskiy V; Davis RL; Wong M; Mayoh C; Mallawaarachchi A; Hort Y; McCabe MJ; Beecroft S; Jackson MR; Arts P; Dubowsky A; Laing N; Dinger ME; Scott HS; Oates E; Pinese M; Cowley MJ
    Genome Biol; 2023 May; 24(1):118. PubMed ID: 37198692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanism and modeling of human disease-associated near-exon intronic variants that perturb RNA splicing.
    Chiang HL; Chen YT; Su JY; Lin HN; Yu CA; Hung YJ; Wang YL; Huang YT; Lin CL
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2022 Nov; 29(11):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36303034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A deep intronic TCTN2 variant activating a cryptic exon predicted by SpliceRover in a patient with Joubert syndrome.
    Hiraide T; Shimizu K; Okumura Y; Miyamoto S; Nakashima M; Ogata T; Saitsu H
    J Hum Genet; 2023 Jul; 68(7):499-505. PubMed ID: 36894704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining full-length gene assay and SpliceAI to interpret the splicing impact of all possible SPINK1 coding variants.
    Wu H; Lin JH; Tang XY; Marenne G; Zou WB; Schutz S; Masson E; Génin E; Fichou Y; Le Gac G; Férec C; Liao Z; Chen JM
    Hum Genomics; 2024 Feb; 18(1):21. PubMed ID: 38414044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CADD-Splice-improving genome-wide variant effect prediction using deep learning-derived splice scores.
    Rentzsch P; Schubach M; Shendure J; Kircher M
    Genome Med; 2021 Feb; 13(1):31. PubMed ID: 33618777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays.
    Smith C; Kitzman JO
    Genome Biol; 2023 Dec; 24(1):294. PubMed ID: 38129864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. All reported non-canonical splice site variants in GLA cause aberrant splicing.
    Okada E; Horinouchi T; Yamamura T; Aoto Y; Suzuki R; Ichikawa Y; Tanaka Y; Masuda C; Kitakado H; Kondo A; Sakakibara N; Ishiko S; Nagano C; Ishimori S; Usui J; Yamagata K; Matsuo M; Nozu K
    Clin Exp Nephrol; 2023 Sep; 27(9):737-746. PubMed ID: 37254000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ParSE-seq: A Calibrated Multiplexed Assay to Facilitate the Clinical Classification of Putative Splice-altering Variants.
    O'Neill MJ; Yang T; Laudeman J; Calandranis M; Solus J; Roden DM; Glazer AM
    medRxiv; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37732247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic features defining exonic variants that modulate splicing.
    Woolfe A; Mullikin JC; Elnitski L
    Genome Biol; 2010; 11(2):R20. PubMed ID: 20158892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational prediction of human deep intronic variation.
    Barbosa P; Savisaar R; Carmo-Fonseca M; Fonseca A
    Gigascience; 2022 Dec; 12():. PubMed ID: 37878682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome-wide detection of human intronic AG-gain variants located between splicing branchpoints and canonical splice acceptor sites.
    Zhang P; Chaldebas M; Ogishi M; Al Qureshah F; Ponsin K; Feng Y; Rinchai D; Milisavljevic B; Han JE; Moncada-Vélez M; Keles S; Schröder B; Stenson PD; Cooper DN; Cobat A; Boisson B; Zhang Q; Boisson-Dupuis S; Abel L; Casanova JL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Nov; 120(46):e2314225120. PubMed ID: 37931111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MutPred Splice: machine learning-based prediction of exonic variants that disrupt splicing.
    Mort M; Sterne-Weiler T; Li B; Ball EV; Cooper DN; Radivojac P; Sanford JR; Mooney SD
    Genome Biol; 2014 Jan; 15(1):R19. PubMed ID: 24451234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of Noncanonical Splice Variants to
    Patel PN; Ito K; Willcox JAL; Haghighi A; Jang MY; Gorham JM; DePalma SR; Lam L; McDonough B; Johnson R; Lakdawala NK; Roberts A; Barton PJR; Cook SA; Fatkin D; Seidman CE; Seidman JG
    Circ Genom Precis Med; 2021 Oct; 14(5):e003389. PubMed ID: 34461741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noncanonical Splice Site and Deep Intronic FRMD7 Variants Activate Cryptic Exons in X-linked Infantile Nystagmus.
    Lee J; Jeong H; Won D; Shin S; Lee ST; Choi JR; Byeon SH; Kuht HJ; Thomas MG; Han J
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Jun; 11(6):25. PubMed ID: 35762937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PDIVAS: Pathogenicity predictor for Deep-Intronic Variants causing Aberrant Splicing.
    Kurosawa R; Iida K; Ajiro M; Awaya T; Yamada M; Kosaki K; Hagiwara M
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):601. PubMed ID: 37817060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.