86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3637781)
1. No code orders: guidelines for policy.
Kellmer DM
Nurs Outlook; 1986; 34(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 3637781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A moral dilemma: the role of judicial intervention in withholding or withdrawing nutrition and hydration.
Peccarelli AM
John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):537-68. PubMed ID: 16622961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A response to Irwin Kramer's reply.
Peccarelli AM
John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):585-9. PubMed ID: 16622963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Life and death decisions: a reply to Judge Peccarelli.
Kramer IR
John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):569-83. PubMed ID: 16622960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Law for leaders. "No Code" orders: current developments and the nursing director's role.
Cushing M
J Nurs Adm; 1981 Apr; 11(4):22-9. PubMed ID: 6914375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Family decisionmaking and forgoing treatment: a judicial perspective.
Shepard RT
Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 7829304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When can a nurse refuse to give care?
Creighton H
Nurs Manage; 1986 Mar; 17(3):16-20. PubMed ID: 3634249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal implications of withholding and withdrawing medical treatment.
Haddad AM; Kapp MB
Caring; 1991 Sep; 10(9):14-9. PubMed ID: 10114395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The legal and moral aspects of termination of life-support systems: a discussion.
Loeffelholz JP; Madden MC; Morgan WK; Tooley WH
Respir Care; 1977 Oct; 22(10):1146-56. PubMed ID: 10314821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Death by default.
Lindgren J
Law Contemp Probl; 1993; 56(3):185-254. PubMed ID: 10129268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond autonomy: judicial restraint and the legal limits necessary to uphold the Hippocratic tradition and preserve the ethical integrity of the medical profession.
Murphy JJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():451-84. PubMed ID: 10126946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The views of the judiciary regarding life-sustaining medical treatment decisions.
Hafemeister TL; Robinson DM
Law Psychol Rev; 1994; 18():189-246. PubMed ID: 16523577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The best interests of incompetent patients: the capacity for interpersonal relationships as a standard for decisionmaking.
Quinn KP
Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jul; 76(4):897-937. PubMed ID: 11650115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. No-code orders vs. resuscitation: the decision to withhold life-prolonging treatment from the terminally ill.
Allan SM
Wayne Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 26(1):139-72. PubMed ID: 11661826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates.
Gostin L
Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Doctors, families and difficult decisions: the implications of the Lawrance case.
Nocon JJ
Indiana Med; 1991 Nov; 84(11):808-10. PubMed ID: 1761855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly.
Baron CH
J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Profoundly diminished life. The casualties of coercion.
Morreim EH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 8045768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
Dippel DL
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients.
Luce JM
West J Med; 1997 Dec; 167(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 9426480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
