These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3637781)

  • 21. Medical ethics after Quinlan: guidelines and the ethics of dying.
    Hudson RP
    J Kans Med Soc; 1982 Jul; 83(7):371-5, 340. PubMed ID: 7119537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
    Cooper R
    Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. "Pulling the plug": are you ready to make the decision?
    Ginsburg WH
    Physicians Manage; 1985 Mar; 25(3):349-51, 354, 357-60 passim. PubMed ID: 10270469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Practicing the PSDA.
    Rouse F; Johnson S; Brock DW; Emanuel L; Wolf SM; Mason D; Mezey M; Purtilo RB; McCloskey EL
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(5):S1-16. PubMed ID: 11642934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Legal and ethical problems in decisions for death.
    Capron AM
    Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):141-4, 157. PubMed ID: 3645223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Withholding nutrition and mistrusting nurturance: the vocabulary of In re Conroy.
    Burt RA
    Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):317-30. PubMed ID: 3104232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prenatal DNR orders and the Baby Doe regulations: case review and analysis.
    Cranston RE
    Ethics Med; 2001; 17(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 15080148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system.
    Deardorff SE
    Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Withholding or withdrawing extraordinary life support. Optimizing rights and limiting liability.
    Gilfix M; Raffin TA
    West J Med; 1984 Sep; 141(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 6506679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience.
    Thomson CJ
    Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. When is medical treatment "futile"?
    Bennett AJ
    Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 8354625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The legal status of 'no code orders'.
    Memel SL; Lemkin JW
    Hosp Med Staff; 1978 May; 7(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 10306909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patients should not always come first in treatment decisions.
    Strong C
    J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 8490224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dynamic complementarity: Terri's law and separation of powers principles in the end-of-life context.
    Snead OC
    Fla Law Rev; 2005 Jan; 57(1):53-89. PubMed ID: 17153246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from minimally conscious patients: who decides?
    Anderson BJ
    J Med Pract Manage; 2002; 18(2):101-3. PubMed ID: 12389332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What we learned from a no-code baby.
    Pavill B
    RN; 1984 Nov; 47(11):34-7. PubMed ID: 6568004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The legislative role in defining medical futility.
    Warren DG
    N C Med J; 1995 Sep; 56(9):453-5. PubMed ID: 7477475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Refusing treatment for incompetent patients; why Quinlan and Saikewicz cases agree on roles of guardians, physicians, judges, and ethics committees.
    Annas GJ
    N Y State J Med; 1980 Apr; 80(5):816-21. PubMed ID: 6930563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. For them rather than by them.
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(6):30-1. PubMed ID: 8307744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.