These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36378939)

  • 21. A comparison of minimally invasive and standard aortic valve replacement.
    Stoliński J; Plicner D; Grudzień G; Wąsowicz M; Musiał R; Andres J; Kapelak B
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Oct; 152(4):1030-9. PubMed ID: 27449562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Via Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy: Propensity Matched Initial Experience.
    Seitz M; Goldblatt J; Paul E; Marcus T; Larobina M; Yap CH
    Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Feb; 28(2):320-326. PubMed ID: 29291961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients.
    Bowdish ME; Hui DS; Cleveland JD; Mack WJ; Sinha R; Ranjan R; Cohen RG; Baker CJ; Cunningham MJ; Barr ML; Starnes VA
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 25750007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aortic Valve Replacement: Is Minimally Invasive Really Better? A Contemporary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    El-Andari R; Fialka NM; Shan S; White A; Manikala VK; Wang S
    Cardiol Rev; 2024 May-Jun 01; 32(3):217-242. PubMed ID: 36728720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Comparison of long-term outcomes.
    Ariyaratnam P; Loubani M; Griffin SC
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2015 Sep; 23(7):814-21. PubMed ID: 25991010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy Versus Partial Upper Sternotomy in Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Bakhtiary F; Salamate S; Amer M; Sirat S; Bayram A; Doss M; El-Sayed Ahmad A
    Adv Ther; 2022 Sep; 39(9):4266-4284. PubMed ID: 35906515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of a minimally invasive approach on reoperative aortic valve replacement.
    Gosev I; Neely RC; Leacche M; McGurk S; Kaneko T; Zeljko D; Loberman D; Javed Q; Cohn LH; Aranki SF
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Mar; 24(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 26204682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Surgical-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials and Propensity-Matched Studies.
    Rawasia WF; Usman MS; Mujeeb FA; Zafar M; Khan SU; Alkhouli M
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 May; 21(5):612-618. PubMed ID: 31672536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minithoracotomy versus full sternotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement: Propensity matched data from two centers.
    Meyer A; van Kampen A; Kiefer P; Sündermann S; Van Praet KM; Borger MA; Falk V; Kempfert J
    J Card Surg; 2021 Jan; 36(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 33135258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.
    Hiraoka A; Totsugawa T; Kuinose M; Nakajima K; Chikazawa G; Tamura K; Yoshitaka H; Sakaguchi T
    Circ J; 2014; 78(12):2876-81. PubMed ID: 25421231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Supracommissural replacement of the ascending aorta and the aortic valve via partial versus full sternotomy-a propensity-matched comparison in a high-volume centre.
    Haunschild J; van Kampen A; von Aspern K; Misfeld M; Davierwala P; Saeed D; Borger MA; Etz CD
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Jan; 61(2):479-487. PubMed ID: 34453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally invasive and full sternotomy in aortic valve replacement: a comparative early operative outcomes.
    Zallé I; Son M; El-Alaoui M; Nijimbéré M; Boumzebra D
    Pan Afr Med J; 2021; 40():68. PubMed ID: 34804336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is it safe to move away from a full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement?
    Kenawy A; Abdelbar A; Tennyson C; Taylor R; Zacharias J
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2020 Nov; 28(9):553-559. PubMed ID: 32727206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical study of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a right parasternal second intercostal transverse incision: The first Chinese experience.
    Lu F; Zhu SQ; Long X; Lin K; Qiu BQ; Pei X; Xu JJ; Wu YB
    Asian J Surg; 2021 Aug; 44(8):1063-1068. PubMed ID: 33622599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Conventional sternotomy versus right mini-thoracotomy versus robotic approach for mitral valve replacement/repair: insights from a network meta-analysis.
    Yokoyama Y; Kuno T; Takagi H; Briasoulis A; Ota T
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2022 Aug; 63(4):492-497. PubMed ID: 34664809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients.
    Furukawa N; Kuss O; Aboud A; Schönbrodt M; Renner A; Hakim Meibodi K; Becker T; Zittermann A; Gummert JF; Börgermann J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 46(2):221-6; discussion 226-7. PubMed ID: 24446478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Low-Risk Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
    Jovanovic MM; Micovic SV; Peric MS; Zivkovic IS; Krasic SD; Milicevic OS; Stankovic SP; Vukovic PM
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2022 Jan; 49(1):. PubMed ID: 35099560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally invasive versus transapical versus transfemoral aortic valve implantation: A one-to-one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis.
    Furukawa N; Kuss O; Emmel E; Scholtz S; Scholtz W; Fujita B; Ensminger S; Gummert JF; Börgermann J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Nov; 156(5):1825-1834. PubMed ID: 29861110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies.
    Shehada SE; Elhmidi Y; Mourad F; Wendt D; El Gabry M; Benedik J; Thielmann M; Jakob H
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 25(4):624-632. PubMed ID: 28962507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Full sternotomy and minimal access approaches for surgical aortic valve replacement: a multicentre propensity-matched study.
    Paparella D; Malvindi PG; Santarpino G; Moscarelli M; Guida P; Fattouch K; Margari V; Martinelli L; Albertini A; Speziale G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Apr; 57(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 31647535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.