These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36379148)

  • 1. When alternative hypotheses shape your beliefs: Context effects in probability judgments.
    Cai X; Pleskac TJ
    Cognition; 2023 Feb; 231():105306. PubMed ID: 36379148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparability effects in probability judgments.
    Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment.
    Sloman S; Rottenstreich Y; Wisniewski E; Hadjichristidis C; Fox CR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 15099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inconsistent probability estimates of a hypothesis: the role of contrasting support.
    Bonini N; Gonzalez M
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 15779531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Similarity between hypotheses and evidence.
    Rottenstreich Y; Brenner L; Sood S
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):110-28. PubMed ID: 10090800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probability judgment in three-category classification learning.
    Koehler DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jan; 26(1):28-52. PubMed ID: 10682289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probability judgement in medicine: discounting unspecified possibilities.
    Redelmeier DA; Koehler DJ; Liberman V; Tversky A
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 7564936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The similarity-updating model of probability judgment and belief revision.
    Albrecht R; Jenny MA; Nilsson H; Rieskamp J
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Nov; 128(6):1088-1111. PubMed ID: 34292023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implications of cognitive load for hypothesis generation and probability judgment.
    Sprenger AM; Dougherty MR; Atkins SM; Franco-Watkins AM; Thomas RP; Lange N; Abbs B
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():129. PubMed ID: 21734897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subjective probability of disjunctive hypotheses: local-weight models for decomposition of evidential support.
    Brenner LA; Koehler DJ
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):16-47. PubMed ID: 10090797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Explanation and estimation of subjective probability by generalized model of Support Theory].
    Saito K; Shigemasu K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1997 Aug; 68(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 9394426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probability judgment and subadditivity: the role of working memory capacity and constraining retrieval.
    Dougherty MR; Hunter J
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):968-82. PubMed ID: 14651303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On belief and fluency in the construction of judgments of learning: Assessing and altering the direct effects of belief.
    Blake AB; Castel AD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():27-38. PubMed ID: 29689481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Judgments under uncertainty: representativeness or potential surprise?
    Fisk JE
    Br J Psychol; 2002 Nov; 93(Pt 4):431-49. PubMed ID: 12519527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judging the Probability of Hypotheses Versus the Impact of Evidence: Which Form of Inductive Inference Is More Accurate and Time-Consistent?
    Tentori K; Chater N; Crupi V
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):758-78. PubMed ID: 26100936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: advances in support theory.
    Rottenstreich Y; Tversky A
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Apr; 104(2):406-15. PubMed ID: 9127585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of causal models in multiple judgments under uncertainty.
    Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR; Pasqualino M; Rehder B
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 25238316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A quantum geometric model of similarity.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jul; 120(3):679-96. PubMed ID: 23915087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments.
    Wang Z; Solloway T; Shiffrin RM; Busemeyer JR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(26):9431-6. PubMed ID: 24979797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.