These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36380146)

  • 1. Inhibition of return as a foraging facilitator in visual search: Evidence from long-term training.
    Li AS; Li Y; He X; Zhang Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jan; 85(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 36380146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No evidence for an independent retinotopic reference frame for inhibition of return.
    Malevich T; Rybina E; Ivtushok E; Ardasheva L; MacInnes WJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jul; 208():103107. PubMed ID: 32562893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Between the Scenes.
    Nadezhda M; Dovbnyuk K; Merzon L; MacInnes WJ
    Exp Psychol; 2022 Jul; 69(4):185-195. PubMed ID: 36305454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator in saccadic search and free viewing.
    Hooge IT; Over EA; van Wezel RJ; Frens MA
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1901-8. PubMed ID: 15797779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fruitful visual search: inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task.
    Thomas LE; Ambinder MS; Hsieh B; Levinthal B; Crowell JA; Irwin DE; Kramer AF; Lleras A; Simons DJ; Wang RF
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):891-5. PubMed ID: 17328391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inhibition of return in a visual foraging task in non-human subjects.
    Shariat Torbaghan S; Yazdi D; Mirpour K; Bisley JW
    Vision Res; 2012 Dec; 74():2-9. PubMed ID: 22521511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Looking back at Waldo: oculomotor inhibition of return does not prevent return fixations.
    Smith TJ; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2011 Jan; 11(1):3. PubMed ID: 21205873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inhibition of return in static but not necessarily in dynamic search.
    Wang Z; Zhang K; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 20045881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for an attentional component of inhibition of return in visual search.
    Pierce AM; Crouse MD; Green JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Nov; 54(11):1676-1685. PubMed ID: 28580702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal oculomotor inhibition of return and spatial facilitation of return in a visual encoding task.
    Luke SG; Schmidt J; Henderson JM
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():400. PubMed ID: 23847574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-search IOR: Searching for inhibition of return after search.
    Höfler M; Liebergesell K; Gilchrist ID; Bauch SA; Ischebeck A; Körner C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():32-38. PubMed ID: 31082701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Just passing through? Inhibition of return in saccadic sequences.
    MacInnes WJ; Krüger HM; Hunt AR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):402-16. PubMed ID: 25219515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inhibition of return functions within but not across searches.
    Höfler M; Gilchrist ID; Körner C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1385-97. PubMed ID: 21472507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Searching for inhibition of return in visual search: a review.
    Wang Z; Klein RM
    Vision Res; 2010 Jan; 50(2):220-8. PubMed ID: 19932128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibitory tagging in an interrupted visual search.
    Thomas LE; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1241-50. PubMed ID: 19633340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm.
    Danziger S; Kingstone A; Snyder JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1467-75. PubMed ID: 9778832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return.
    Tang X; Wang X; Peng X; Li Q; Zhang C; Wang A; Zhang M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8056. PubMed ID: 33850180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From alternation to repetition: Spatial attention biases contribute to sequential effects in a choice reaction-time task.
    Green JJ; Spalek TM; McDonald JJ
    Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 11(1-2):24-36. PubMed ID: 31512985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. There's little return for attentional momentum.
    Snyder JJ; Schmidt WC; Kingstone A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1726-37. PubMed ID: 19968431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using the locus of slack logic to determine whether the output form of inhibition of return affects an early or late stage of processing.
    Klein RM; Kavyani M; Farsi A; Lawrence MA
    Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():123-130. PubMed ID: 30527265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.