329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36381375)
1. Machine learning models for predicting acute kidney injury: a systematic review and critical appraisal.
Vagliano I; Chesnaye NC; Leopold JH; Jager KJ; Abu-Hanna A; Schut MC
Clin Kidney J; 2022 Dec; 15(12):2266-2280. PubMed ID: 36381375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal.
Wynants L; Van Calster B; Collins GS; Riley RD; Heinze G; Schuit E; Bonten MMJ; Dahly DL; Damen JAA; Debray TPA; de Jong VMT; De Vos M; Dhiman P; Haller MC; Harhay MO; Henckaerts L; Heus P; Kammer M; Kreuzberger N; Lohmann A; Luijken K; Ma J; Martin GP; McLernon DJ; Andaur Navarro CL; Reitsma JB; Sergeant JC; Shi C; Skoetz N; Smits LJM; Snell KIE; Sperrin M; Spijker R; Steyerberg EW; Takada T; Tzoulaki I; van Kuijk SMJ; van Bussel B; van der Horst ICC; van Royen FS; Verbakel JY; Wallisch C; Wilkinson J; Wolff R; Hooft L; Moons KGM; van Smeden M
BMJ; 2020 Apr; 369():m1328. PubMed ID: 32265220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Machine learning models for diabetes management in acute care using electronic medical records: A systematic review.
Kamel Rahimi A; Canfell OJ; Chan W; Sly B; Pole JD; Sullivan C; Shrapnel S
Int J Med Inform; 2022 Apr; 162():104758. PubMed ID: 35398812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction models for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a protocol for systematic review and critical appraisal.
Wang D; Zhang W; Luo J; Fang H; Jing S; Mei Z
BMJ Open; 2021 May; 11(5):e046274. PubMed ID: 34011595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kreuzberger N; Damen JA; Trivella M; Estcourt LJ; Aldin A; Umlauff L; Vazquez-Montes MD; Wolff R; Moons KG; Monsef I; Foroutan F; Kreuzer KA; Skoetz N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD012022. PubMed ID: 32735048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic models of in-hospital mortality of intensive care patients using neural representation of unstructured text: A systematic review and critical appraisal.
Vagliano I; Dormosh N; Rios M; Luik TT; Buonocore TM; Elbers PWG; Dongelmans DA; Schut MC; Abu-Hanna A
J Biomed Inform; 2023 Oct; 146():104504. PubMed ID: 37742782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review.
Dhiman P; Ma J; Andaur Navarro CL; Speich B; Bullock G; Damen JAA; Hooft L; Kirtley S; Riley RD; Van Calster B; Moons KGM; Collins GS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):101. PubMed ID: 35395724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic models for predicting relapse or recurrence of major depressive disorder in adults.
Moriarty AS; Meader N; Snell KI; Riley RD; Paton LW; Chew-Graham CA; Gilbody S; Churchill R; Phillips RS; Ali S; McMillan D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(5):CD013491. PubMed ID: 33956992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence.
Collins GS; Dhiman P; Andaur Navarro CL; Ma J; Hooft L; Reitsma JB; Logullo P; Beam AL; Peng L; Van Calster B; van Smeden M; Riley RD; Moons KG
BMJ Open; 2021 Jul; 11(7):e048008. PubMed ID: 34244270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic review of prognostic prediction models for acute kidney injury (AKI) in general hospital populations.
Hodgson LE; Sarnowski A; Roderick PJ; Dimitrov BD; Venn RM; Forni LG
BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016591. PubMed ID: 28963291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multivariable prediction models for health care spending using machine learning: a protocol of a systematic review.
Huang AW; Haslberger M; Coulibaly N; Galárraga O; Oganisian A; Belbasis L; Panagiotou OA
Diagn Progn Res; 2022 Mar; 6(1):4. PubMed ID: 35321760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive Models for Estimating the Probability of Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review.
Black N; Henderson I; Al Wattar BH; Quenby S
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Nov; 140(5):821-841. PubMed ID: 36201785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reporting and Methods in Developing Prognostic Prediction Models for Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.
Zhang H; Shao J; Chen D; Zou P; Cui N; Tang L; Wang D; Ye Z
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes; 2020; 13():4981-4992. PubMed ID: 33364802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can medical practitioners rely on prediction models for COVID-19? A systematic review.
Shamsoddin E
Evid Based Dent; 2020 Sep; 21(3):84-86. PubMed ID: 32978532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multivariable prediction models for fetal macrosomia and large for gestational age: A systematic review.
Ewington L; Black N; Leeson C; Al Wattar BH; Quenby S
BJOG; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38465451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review of the quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation.
Ratna MB; Bhattacharya S; Abdulrahim B; McLernon DJ
Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):100-116. PubMed ID: 31960915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reporting and risk of bias of prediction models based on machine learning methods in preterm birth: A systematic review.
Yang Q; Fan X; Cao X; Hao W; Lu J; Wei J; Tian J; Yin M; Ge L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jan; 102(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 36397723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic models for patients suffering a heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review.
Jia YY; Cui NQ; Jia TT; Song JP
ESC Heart Fail; 2024 Jun; 11(3):1341-1351. PubMed ID: 38318693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multivariable prediction models of caries increment: a systematic review and critical appraisal.
Havsed K; Hänsel Petersson G; Isberg PE; Pigg M; Svensäter G; ; Rohlin M
Syst Rev; 2023 Oct; 12(1):202. PubMed ID: 37904228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome prediction models incorporating clinical variables for Head and Neck Squamous cell Carcinoma: A systematic review of methodological conduct and risk of bias.
Aly F; Hansen CR; Al Mouiee D; Sundaresan P; Haidar A; Vinod S; Holloway L
Radiother Oncol; 2023 Jun; 183():109629. PubMed ID: 36934895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
