203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36382373)
1. Females alter their mate preferences depending on hybridization risk.
Calabrese GM; Pfennig KS
Biol Lett; 2022 Nov; 18(11):20220310. PubMed ID: 36382373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reinforcement generates reproductive isolation between neighbouring conspecific populations of spadefoot toads.
Pfennig KS; Rice AM
Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20140949. PubMed ID: 24990680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Facultative mate choice drives adaptive hybridization.
Pfennig KS
Science; 2007 Nov; 318(5852):965-7. PubMed ID: 17991861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hybrid female mate choice as a species isolating mechanism: environment matters.
Schmidt EM; Pfennig KS
J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 26717048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Character displacement and the evolution of mate choice: an artificial neural network approach.
Pfennig KS; Ryan MJ
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 362(1479):411-9. PubMed ID: 17255015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Female toads engaging in adaptive hybridization prefer high-quality heterospecifics as mates.
Chen C; Pfennig KS
Science; 2020 Mar; 367(6484):1377-1379. PubMed ID: 32193328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential selection to avoid hybridization in two toad species.
Pfennig KS; Simovich MA
Evolution; 2002 Sep; 56(9):1840-8. PubMed ID: 12389729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Leptin Manipulation Reduces Appetite and Causes a Switch in Mating Preference in the Plains Spadefoot Toad (Spea bombifrons).
Garcia NW; Pfennig KS; Burmeister SS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0125981. PubMed ID: 25919309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predator experience overrides learned aversion to heterospecifics in stickleback species pairs.
Kozak GM; Boughman JW
Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Apr; 282(1805):. PubMed ID: 25808887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Community composition affects the shape of mate response functions.
Symes LB
Evolution; 2014 Jul; 68(7):2005-13. PubMed ID: 24689891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Female mate preferences on high-dimensional shape variation for male species recognition traits.
Siepielski AM; McPeek SJ; McPeek MA
J Evol Biol; 2018 Aug; 31(8):1239-1250. PubMed ID: 29876989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequential mate choice and sexual isolation in threespine stickleback species.
Kozak GM; Head ML; Lackey AC; Boughman JW
J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 23194003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diet alters species recognition in juvenile toads.
Pfennig KS; Rodriguez Moncalvo VG; Burmeister SS
Biol Lett; 2013 Oct; 9(5):20130599. PubMed ID: 24088562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Why do males choose heterospecific females in the red spider mite?
Sato Y; Staudacher H; Sabelis MW
Exp Appl Acarol; 2016 Jan; 68(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 26530994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glucocorticoids, male sexual signals, and mate choice by females: Implications for sexual selection.
Leary CJ; Baugh AT
Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2020 Mar; 288():113354. PubMed ID: 31830474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Successful mating and hybridisation in two closely related flatworm species despite significant differences in reproductive morphology and behaviour.
Singh P; Ballmer DN; Laubscher M; Schärer L
Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12830. PubMed ID: 32732887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Males and females contribute differently to the evolution of habitat segregation driven by hybridization.
Kyogoku D; Yamaguchi R
J Evol Biol; 2023 Mar; 36(3):515-528. PubMed ID: 36721300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
