226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36383177)
1. Global impacts of
Kaufman R; Brown R; Martínez Coral C; Jacob J; Onyango M; Thomasen K
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2022 Dec; 30(1):2135574. PubMed ID: 36383177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of
Herr A
Am J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 49(4):471-492. PubMed ID: 38563269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3.
Ahmed A; Evans DP; Jackson J; Meier BM; Tomori C
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):485-489. PubMed ID: 38088610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Societal implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.
Brindis CD; Laitner MH; Clayton EW; Scrimshaw SC; Grosz BJ; Simpson LA; Rosenbaum S; Brierley CL; Simon MA; Roubideaux Y; Calonge BN; Johnson PA; DeStefano L; Bear A; Arora KS; Dzau VJ
Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2751-2754. PubMed ID: 38795714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Otolaryngologists and Reproductive Rights.
Yalamanchi P; Faucett EA; Shuman AG
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Nov; 169(5):1393-1396. PubMed ID: 37210612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the
Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022): consequences one year on.
Ottley E; Szopa K; Fletcher J
Med Law Rev; 2023 Aug; 31(3):457-468. PubMed ID: 37491697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.
Brindis CD; Laitner MH; Clayton EW; Scrimshaw SC; Grosz BJ; Simpson LA; Rosenbaum S; Brierley CL; Simon MA; Roubideaux Y; Calonge BN; Johnson PA; DeStefano L; Bear A; Arora KS; Dzau VJ
Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2747-2750. PubMed ID: 38795713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Court is ignoring science.
Foster DG
Science; 2022 May; 376(6595):779. PubMed ID: 35575724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
Rader B; Upadhyay UD; Sehgal NKR; Reis BY; Brownstein JS; Hswen Y
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(20):2041-2047. PubMed ID: 36318194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The state of abortion rights in the US.
Davis MF
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion needs expressed on Reddit after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in the United States.
John JN; Martin ZC
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2024 Mar; 56(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 38439171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The criminalisation of women's healthcare in the post-Dobbs era: an analysis of the anti-abortion trigger law statutes.
Domanski K; Allswede M
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2023 Oct; 28(5):258-262. PubMed ID: 37590051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Protecting and Advancing Women's Health and Rights Post-Roe Era Through Policy.
Pirkle JRA
Health Educ Behav; 2023 Aug; 50(4):538-542. PubMed ID: 37073474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Buchbinder M; Mishtal J; Singer EO; Wendland CL
Med Anthropol Q; 2022 Dec; 36(4):433-441. PubMed ID: 36433774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion and Reproductive Freedom: Constitutional and Practical Issues.
Smith SR
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jun; 66(2):312-322. PubMed ID: 37130376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproductive Rights and Women's Mental Health.
Stotland NL
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2023 Sep; 46(3):607-619. PubMed ID: 37500254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The United States Supreme Court ruling and women's reproductive rights - A position statement issued by The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG).
Louwen F; Mukhopadhyay S; Mahmood T; Martins NN; Tarlatzis B;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Dec; 279():130-131. PubMed ID: 36334375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevention and women's reproductive health: a matter of concern.
Sable MR; Galambos CM
Health Soc Work; 2006 Aug; 31(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 16955654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
