278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36384079)
21. Accuracy of virtual planned surgery versus conventional free-hand surgery for reconstruction of the mandible with osteocutaneous free flaps.
Pucci R; Weyh A; Smotherman C; Valentini V; Bunnell A; Fernandes R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Sep; 49(9):1153-1161. PubMed ID: 32197824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In-house 3D treatment planning for mandibular reconstruction by free fibula flap in cancer: Our technique.
Damecourt A; Nieto N; Galmiche S; Garrel R; de Boutray M
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2020 Dec; 137(6):501-505. PubMed ID: 32139198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Virtual surgical planning for maxillary reconstruction with the scapular free flap: An evaluation of a simple cutting guide design.
Tran KL; Kwon JY; Gui XY; Wang E; Yang D; Durham JS; Prisman E
Head Neck; 2023 Jan; 45(1):115-125. PubMed ID: 36255135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Long-Term Operative Outcomes of Preoperative Computed Tomography-Guided Virtual Surgical Planning for Osteocutaneous Free Flap Mandible Reconstruction.
Chang EI; Jenkins MP; Patel SA; Topham NS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Feb; 137(2):619-623. PubMed ID: 26818299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Economic analysis of a low-cost virtual surgical planning protocol for mandibular reconstruction: a case series.
Spaas C; Lenssen O
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 57(8):743-748. PubMed ID: 31303356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Time and cost-analysis of virtual surgical planning for head and neck reconstruction: A matched pair analysis.
Mazzola F; Smithers F; Cheng K; Mukherjee P; Hubert Low TH; Ch'ng S; Palme CE; Clark JR
Oral Oncol; 2020 Jan; 100():104491. PubMed ID: 31794886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Functional and esthetic outcomes of virtual surgical planning versus the conventional technique in mandibular reconstruction with a free fibula flap: A retrospective study of 24 cases.
Garajei A; Modarresi A; Arabkheradmand A; Shirkhoda M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Apr; 52(4):454-463. PubMed ID: 38448334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dosimetry-guided virtual surgical planning in the reconstruction of mandibular osteoradionecrosis.
Jenkins GW; Iqbal S; West N; Ellabban I; Kennedy MP; Adams JR
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Oct; 59(8):947-951. PubMed ID: 34256959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Changing indications for maxillomandibular reconstruction with osseous free flaps: a 17-year experience with 620 consecutive cases at UCLA and the impact of osteoradionecrosis.
Zaghi S; Danesh J; Hendizadeh L; Nabili V; Blackwell KE
Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1329-35. PubMed ID: 23946198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Real-time intraoperative computed tomography can accurize virtual surgical planning on the double-barrel fibular flap for mandibular reconstruction.
Lin CH; Hsu CH; Adarsh K; Hsu CM; Wu CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2702-2705. PubMed ID: 35466077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Virtual surgical planning for mandibular reconstruction in an abbreviated admission pathway.
Speed OE; Rickels KL; Farsi S; Merrill T; Gardner JR; King D; Sunde J; Vural E; Moreno MA
Am J Otolaryngol; 2024; 45(3):104141. PubMed ID: 38194889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Black Bone MRI for Virtual Surgical Planning in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery.
Vyas KS; Suchyta MA; Hunt CH; Gibreel W; Mardini S
Semin Plast Surg; 2022 Aug; 36(3):192-198. PubMed ID: 36506277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mandibular reconstruction after cancer: an in-house approach to manufacturing cutting guides.
Bosc R; Hersant B; Carloni R; Niddam J; Bouhassira J; De Kermadec H; Bequignon E; Wojcik T; Julieron M; Meningaud JP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 27815013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Resorption of fibula bone following mandibular reconstruction for osteoradionecrosis.
Powell HR; Jaafar M; Bisase B; Kerawala CJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 52(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 24613371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computer-assisted versus traditional technique in fibular free-flap mandibular reconstruction: A CT symmetry study.
Bartier S; Mazzaschi O; Benichou L; Sauvaget E
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2021 Jan; 138(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 32620425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Single-Unit 3D-Printed Titanium Reconstruction Plate for Maxillary Reconstruction: The Evolution of Surgical Reconstruction for Maxillary Defects-A Case Report and Review of Current Techniques.
Melville JC; Manis CS; Shum JW; Alsuwied D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 77(4):874.e1-874.e13. PubMed ID: 30615849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mandibular reconstruction using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing: an analysis of surgical results.
Foley BD; Thayer WP; Honeybrook A; McKenna S; Press S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e111-9. PubMed ID: 23164998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A 3D Analysis of Plating Strategies in Mandibular Reconstruction: A Randomized Control Pilot Study.
Chen T; Chan HHL; de Almeida J; Goldstein DP; Gilbert RW; Yao CMKL; Irish JC; Davies JC
Laryngoscope; 2024 May; 134(5):2182-2186. PubMed ID: 37962081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Shape of Things to Come: In-Hospital Three-Dimensional Printing for Mandibular Reconstruction Using Fibula Free Flap.
Zavattero E; Fasolis M; Novaresio A; Gerbino G; Borbon C; Ramieri G
Laryngoscope; 2020 Dec; 130(12):E811-E816. PubMed ID: 32249936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Application of personalized guide plate combined with real-time navigation in repairing mandibular defect using fibula muscle flap].
Gao T; Wang D; Chen M; Zhan Z; Peng X; Zhang K
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 36(6):691-697. PubMed ID: 35712925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
