BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36384463)

  • 21. Prognostic significance of positive circumferential resection margin in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wu J; Chen QX; Teng LS; Krasna MJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Feb; 97(2):446-53. PubMed ID: 24365211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development and Validation of the Optimal Circumferential Resection Margin in Pathological T3 Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.
    Haneda R; Kikuchi H; Nagakura Y; Notsu A; Booka E; Murakami T; Matsumoto T; Mayanagi S; Morita Y; Hiramatsu Y; Tsubosa Y; Takeuchi H
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 35235087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of circumferential resection margin involvement on survival in patients with operable oesophageal cancer.
    Chan DS; Reid TD; Howell I; Lewis WG
    Br J Surg; 2013 Mar; 100(4):456-64. PubMed ID: 23319427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: prognostic value of circumferential resection margin and stratification of N1 category.
    Saha AK; Sutton C; Rotimi O; Dexter S; Sue-Ling H; Sarela AI
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1364-70. PubMed ID: 19252949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of circumferential resection margin on prognosis in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer approached through the transhiatal route.
    Scheepers JJ; van der Peet DL; Veenhof AA; Cuesta MA
    Dis Esophagus; 2009; 22(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19196265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the 7th edition of the TNM classification in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Wang J; Wu N; Zheng QF; Yan S; Lv C; Li SL; Yang Y
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 20(48):18397-403. PubMed ID: 25561808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of circumferential resection margin status on survival and recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
    Gu YM; Yang YS; Kong WL; Shang QX; Zhang HL; Wang WP; Yuan Y; Che GW; Chen LQ
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():965255. PubMed ID: 36119475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with positive circumferential resection margin.
    Otake R; Okamura A; Yamashita K; Imamura Y; Kanamori J; Kozuki R; Takahashi K; Toihata T; Yamamoto N; Asari T; Mine S; Watanabe M
    Esophagus; 2021 Apr; 18(2):288-295. PubMed ID: 33108536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prognostic significance of positive circumferential resection margin post neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
    Patrão AS; Papaxoinis G; Kordatou Z; Weaver JM; Owen-Holt V; Alkhaffaf B; Galloway S; Mansoor W
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 45(3):439-445. PubMed ID: 30786962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A critical appraisal of circumferential resection margins in esophageal carcinoma.
    Pultrum BB; Honing J; Smit JK; van Dullemen HM; van Dam GM; Groen H; Hollema H; Plukker JT
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):812-20. PubMed ID: 19924487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement in oesophageal malignancy.
    Griffiths EA; Brummell Z; Gorthi G; Pritchard SA; Welch IM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 May; 32(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 16504455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally Invasive Circumferential Hiatal Dissection for the Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Distal Esophagus and Esophago-gastric Junction: Technical Considerations Combined With Histopathological Outcomes.
    Lorenzi B; Davakis S; Syllaios A; Kordzadeh A; Kadri M; Ram M; Fareed K; Barter C; Charalabopoulos A
    Anticancer Res; 2019 Jun; 39(6):3219-3225. PubMed ID: 31177171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of circumferential resection margin status on loco-regional recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Park HJ; Kim HJ; Chie EK; Kang CH; Kim YT
    J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 107(7):762-6. PubMed ID: 23280705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Defining a positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer and its implications for adjuvant treatment.
    O'Neill JR; Stephens NA; Save V; Kamel HM; Phillips HA; Driscoll PJ; Paterson-Brown S
    Br J Surg; 2013 Jul; 100(8):1055-63. PubMed ID: 23616367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer.
    Dexter SP; Sue-Ling H; McMahon MJ; Quirke P; Mapstone N; Martin IG
    Gut; 2001 May; 48(5):667-70. PubMed ID: 11302966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [IMRT-based preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): an analysis of outcome and prognosis].
    Men Y; Hui ZG; Liang J; Feng QF; Chen DF; Zhang HX; Xiao ZF; Zhou ZM; Wang LH
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 38(9):682-6. PubMed ID: 27647401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Associated factors of postoperative relapse and metastasis in pT1bN0M0-pT4aN0M0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
    Pan W; Xiang Y; Gu Z; Ji C; Mao T; Fang W
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1045-1049. PubMed ID: 28900998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical outcomes and benefits for staging of surgical lymph node mapping after esophagectomy.
    Lagarde SM; Phillips AW; Navidi M; Disep B; Griffin SM
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Dec; 30(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 28881884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography.
    Reid TD; Chan DS; Roberts SA; Crosby TD; Williams GT; Lewis WG
    Br J Cancer; 2012 Dec; 107(12):1925-31. PubMed ID: 23169281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of criteria and clinical significance of circumferential resection margins in esophageal cancer.
    Deeter M; Dorer R; Kuppusamy MK; Koehler RP; Low DE
    Arch Surg; 2009 Jul; 144(7):618-24. PubMed ID: 19620541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.